| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,187
Threads: 82,434
Posts: 853,806
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Della | |  | | 
21-06-2011, 08:43 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 62
| | | Re: Treecreeper Lol i shot the image in low light so thought there was a small amount of image noise in the tail
__________________ Dan
http://www.djaphoto.co.uk - My Website | 
22-06-2011, 01:26 AM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2011 Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire
Posts: 388
| | | Re: Treecreeper I really admire your ability to beat your own shots up, as far as I can tell, that is a keeper!
Cheers
__________________ OpNut72 (Steve)
"It looked crystal clear in the finder honest!" | 
22-06-2011, 12:59 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Blackpool, Lancashire
Posts: 867
| | | Re: Treecreeper Quote:
Originally Posted by djaphoto Lol i shot the image in low light so thought there was a small amount of image noise in the tail | I think it's fine and your camera is handling the low light really well. If anything, I'd have cropped the green 'blob' out of the bottom right corner of the shot (presumably an out of focus leaf?) just to avoid its distraction and tidy the image up a little. But at the size I'm viewing the image at on my PC I wouldn't worry about the level of noise you're getting. Have you tried printing any out at various sizes yet? It'd be interesting to hear how they look in print and whether you consider the noise an issue in that format | 
22-06-2011, 05:05 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 62
| | | Re: Treecreeper Thanks guys, much appreciate the comments.
I have plenty more images from my collection to share
__________________ Dan
http://www.djaphoto.co.uk - My Website | 
29-06-2011, 02:48 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: London and NW Scotland
Posts: 1,021
| | | Re: Treecreeper A great shot, Dan.
I know exactly what you mean about their movements. They are one of the most difficult birds to photograph - a combination of very quick and very erratic makes it almost impossible to predict what they are going to do.
Dave
__________________ ----------------------------------
http://davemphotos.blogspot.co.uk/ | 
30-06-2011, 02:08 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Blackpool, Lancashire
Posts: 867
| | | Re: Treecreeper Quote:
Originally Posted by djaphoto I have plenty more images from my collection to share  | Look forward to them!... |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | treecreeper :) | wildsusy | British Birds | 4 | 18-04-2011 02:05 PM | | treecreeper - very sad | alisonclair | British Birds | 2 | 16-11-2010 08:05 PM | | Treecreeper ? | SuzieandFlo | British Birds | 4 | 18-04-2010 10:05 PM | | Treecreeper | colincurry | British Birds | 9 | 25-10-2009 09:55 PM | | Treecreeper | sleipnerofasgard | British Birds | 5 | 23-03-2009 04:04 PM | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | moth Today 05:29 AM 1 Replies, 40 Views | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! 01-06-2012 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 200 Views | | | | | |