| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
| |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
| |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
| |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
| |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| 1 | 2 | 3 | » Stats |
Members: 48,632
Threads: 78,838
Posts: 820,897
Top Poster: glsammy (14,775) | | Welcome to our newest member, ratneck7 | |  | 
20-10-2009, 10:02 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Horley, UK
Posts: 182
| | | Long enough for safari? Hi,
I'm guessing at least some of you guys will have been on a safari, and can help me!
I plan a safari next year. As usual, budget is limited (especially after paying for the safari!), so shelling out £7k for a 600mm f/4 is not an option.
At the moment I have a Nikon D300 + Sigma 100-300mm + 1.4TC combo (so a 210-630mm in 35mm money), which I find works great. I was in Bushy park at the weekend photographing deer, and found it to be plenty long enough for anything except portraits.
My question is simple, will this combo cut it (i.e. will it be long enough) for a safari, or would I just be wasting my time? I keep reading on certain websites comments like "500mm minimum on DX", "at least 400mm + 1.4 TC, otherwise forget it".
Nick | 
20-10-2009, 11:08 PM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: i'm right here
Posts: 11,092
| | | Re: Long enough for safari? Quote:
Originally Posted by DrNickBurton Hi,
I'm guessing at least some of you guys will have been on a safari, and can help me!
I plan a safari next year. As usual, budget is limited (especially after paying for the safari!), so shelling out £7k for a 600mm f/4 is not an option.
At the moment I have a Nikon D300 + Sigma 100-300mm + 1.4TC combo (so a 210-630mm in 35mm money), which I find works great. I was in Bushy park at the weekend photographing deer, and found it to be plenty long enough for anything except portraits.
My question is simple, will this combo cut it (i.e. will it be long enough) for a safari, or would I just be wasting my time? I keep reading on certain websites comments like "500mm minimum on DX", "at least 400mm + 1.4 TC, otherwise forget it".
Nick | if it works for deer it will be fine on safari - you get a lot closer on the whole to animals on safari than you do to british wildlife + african wildlife is generally bigger and the light is better.
its not ideal but as you say buying a longer lense isnt an option you best go with it
other considerations for safari are
a) dust - take either sensor swaps or an artic buterfly for sensor cleaning and keep lense changes to a minimum, use a bulb blower to clean lenses
b) plenty of batteries and memory cards
c) unless you have loads of memory cards either a downloader or a laptop to download in the evenings
d) lense support - you wont be able to use a tripod in a safari vehicle so you need either a monopod or a bean bag or both ( note if you take a bean bag get a zip up one and take it empty then fill it with native beans on arrival)
e) take at least one camera body and lense in your hand luggage as you dont want to be left cameraless f the airline loses your hold luggage.
__________________ Some people are like slinkies, good for nowt, but they make you smile when pushed down stairs | 
21-10-2009, 12:12 AM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Scotland/Spain
Posts: 5,611
| | | Re: Long enough for safari? Nick, here is a link with good information and a free ebook on safari photography The Best Telephoto Lenses For Safari Wildlife Photography
__________________ As you get old three things occur. First your memory goes, and I can't remember the other two... | 
21-10-2009, 01:52 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Nairn,Nairnshire,Scotland
Posts: 3,355
| | | Re: Long enough for safari? Nick I would say that the combinations that your on about are fine for your photography remember you will be in a vehicle which will no doubt manouver round to allow pics to be taken.
Also all points mentioned by Eeyore above all hold true changing lens in hot and sandy conditions could cause problems take care
__________________ Cheers............Bill | 
21-10-2009, 05:08 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: London & Norfolk
Posts: 38
| | | Re: Long enough for safari? Hi Nick,
I would think your combo would be plenty enough reach for safari. I took my 100-400 lens and found it was all I needed as the guides know how to get pretty close to the game. As eeyore says, you'll need a beanbag for support though.
Elevate | 
24-10-2009, 08:34 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Horley, UK
Posts: 182
| | | Re: Long enough for safari? Thanks for the reassurances guys. I did think it would be sufficient, but the number of articles I read which suggested otherwise gave me some doubts!
Unfortunately, it's now looking like a safari next year is probably off the cards  , but the knowledge will still come in useful one day!
__________________ http://nickburtonswildlifephotography.blogspot.com/
http://nickburton.smugmug.com/ |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 29 members and 299 guests | | aeshna5, artistred66, Astra, Birdman1976, DorsetDunk, Dorts, earthgraham, Farplace, FUDGEY, GTH, Jim Ford, John B (NTS), John_M, KentYeti, MattPrince, nursiebernard, Podgod, rogpow, Scubi, shenk1, squishy, the naturelover, tigertom, Tormentil, Tringa, Ukwildlifeo, waxcap, welsh.lensman, Wood Wanderer | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |