| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
| |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
| |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
| |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
| |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| 1 | 2 | 3 | » Stats |
Members: 48,655
Threads: 78,892
Posts: 821,435
Top Poster: glsammy (14,779) | | Welcome to our newest member, redfrag | |  | 
18-09-2006, 01:09 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Exeter
Posts: 248
| | | Using extension tubes with a macro lens Hi
I've recently purchased the Tamron 90mm macro lens which I'm very pleased with, however I would like to go beyond 1:1. I understand using extension tubes with the lens this might be possible? Does anyone have any experience of using a macro lens with extensions tubes? Any tips or pros and cons would be greatly appreciated
Thanks
Karl. | 
18-09-2006, 01:26 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: N.E.SOMERSET
Posts: 8,985
| | | Re: Using extension tubes with a macro lens I am currently using a Sigma 105 and have been trying it with Kenko auto tubes
or a coupling ring and a reversed takumar 35mm lense
I have started with the 12mm ring any more and I do not get even average results
but it is interesting enough for me to persevre there are many good sites on the subject some are included in the threads on macro on this site
__________________ Your garden their refuge, a jig-saw of habitats for wildlife under pressure | 
18-09-2006, 02:19 PM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: i'm right here
Posts: 11,100
| | | Re: Using extension tubes with a macro lens I use a Tamron 90mm and have had good results using extension tubes (I have the jessops set £79) and also using 2x TC - If you use both together you can get nearly 3:1 but you need to use the TC against the camera body then the tubes then the lens so that it is doubling the entire effect. Be aware that you may lose your autofocus depending on what contacts your tubes have , but as most people use MF for macro anyway this isnt a big consideration. A good book to read if you want to learn more about macro set ups is "small things big" by paul harcourt davies.
__________________ Some people are like slinkies, good for nowt, but they make you smile when pushed down stairs | 
18-09-2006, 10:04 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Hastings, Sussex
Posts: 1,030
| | | Re: Using extension tubes with a macro lens I also use a Tamron 90mm and like Eeyore i have a Teleconverter first on the body (1.4) then normally either one or 2 tubes (either 36mm or 56mm total).
I'm really enjoying using them (I have a Nikon D50 and Kenko Pro DG tubes) and mainly use manual focus but these did retain Auto also. The main issue is that you need a dedicated flash unit often because the lens is so close to the subject that the built in flash often cant hit it. Also bear in mind that the weight starts to add up, not really an issue for me but for some it may be.
Also - using tubes means you lose the ability to focus on infinity. Not that great an issue but it severely reduces your working distances. That said It's not really been a big issue for me, just something to think about. Just means whipping your ext tube off if something bigger comes your way.
I ended up getting a ring flash to combat those lighting issues. Not necessary if you have an off camera flash that you can pop on a bracket.
In short - I like mine, very happy I bought them as they add more options to my pictures. For the price I think they are well worth it.
TobyH |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 0 members and 182 guests | | No Members online | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | Newts Yesterday 11:03 PM 12 Replies, 1,445 Views | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |