| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 28 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
| |
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
| |
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
| |
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
| |
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | 3 | » Stats |
Members: 34,088
Threads: 51,292
Posts: 561,050
Top Poster: glsammy (13,488) | | Welcome to our newest member, Russ62 | | |
Welcome to the Wild About Britain forums | | | |  | 
31-08-2006, 01:26 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: East Sussex
Posts: 803
| | | Depth of field Is it possible to work out the depth of field for each f stop?
I have a 350D with a Sigma 105mm macro.
Thanks
Kev | 
31-08-2006, 01:42 PM
|  | Frozen | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: N.E. Lincolnshire
Posts: 4,130
| | | Re: Depth of field Quote: |
Originally Posted by Chalk Downlanders Is it possible to work out the depth of field for each f stop?
I have a 350D with a Sigma 105mm macro.
Thanks
Kev | If you do a search you can often find them. Remember though, DOF depends not just on the F Stop, but the distance away from the subjects! The closer to, the less DOF.
You can do tests with your own combination though. Try sticking some pins in a row in some card or similar, and photographing it looking along the pins and slightly to one side. You can also just photograph a ruler looking down on it at say 30 degrees, using different apertures, or even just taking pics of lined or fine graph paper. Mark a spot to focus on and you should be able to get a good idea of DOF from the resulting images. | 
31-08-2006, 02:34 PM
|  | Dame Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: North Kent
Posts: 7,699
| | | Re: Depth of field Blimey Alan, you're so clever. What a good idea. Even I can do that! Jules
__________________ The female of the species is more deadly than the male.:p | 
31-08-2006, 02:43 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: London, UK
Posts: 385
| | | Re: Depth of field Check the Sigma website on these links: 105mm macro lens Dof Table for the 105mm
Jerry | 
31-08-2006, 03:25 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: East Sussex
Posts: 803
| | | Re: Depth of field Quote: |
Originally Posted by jerryh | Thanks Jerry. I looked at the table but I do not understand it. In laymens terms please
Thanks Alan. I was going to do that if it was not simple to work out.
Kev | 
31-08-2006, 03:32 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: east grinstead
Posts: 215
| | | Re: Depth of field depth of field is that distance that an image is in acceptable focus ie is sharp enough to be viewed in detail any depth of field table will only give approximate distances .it is coupled with depth of focus and a set of things called circles of confusion .i have never been overly worried about set distances and always decide what bit i need in focus and work from there . some canons have a dep mode as opposed to a depth of field preview but this was canons April fool it is cr**p | 
31-08-2006, 04:06 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Gloucester
Posts: 1,379
| | | Re: Depth of field you may like to d/load this and print it off. Or there is an online dof calculator here
Just remember when you start really stopping the lens down for max dof you will be hitting the diffraction limits of the lens and the the image will soften
__________________ Kev Lewis - [URL="http://www.photosbykev.com"]www.photosbykev.com[/URL] | 
31-08-2006, 09:02 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Broad hinton - thats in wiltshire
Posts: 9,620
| | | Re: Depth of field and if you have any dirt on the sensor , and lets face it who doesnt  , it will be much more apparent at high F stops
__________________ Eeyore : reasonably attractive ... and attractively reasonable ;) | 
01-09-2006, 06:52 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: East Sussex
Posts: 803
| | | Re: Depth of field Quote: |
Originally Posted by Kev Lewis you may like to d/load this and print it off. Or there is an online dof calculator here
Just remember when you start really stopping the lens down for max dof you will be hitting the diffraction limits of the lens and the the image will soften | Good link.
Thanks Kev | 
02-09-2006, 05:32 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 34
| | | Re: Depth of field Quote: |
Originally Posted by Kev Lewis you may like to d/load this and print it off. Or there is an online dof calculator here
Just remember when you start really stopping the lens down for max dof you will be hitting the diffraction limits of the lens and the the image will soften | Those links are great, I also found this one useful, there's a good explanation of DoF and Hyperfocal Distance there. I have a pocketpc and there's some software here that's useful for calculating DoF and Hyperfocal distance when you need it for any lens.
I definitely agree with the comment about diffraction, until I understood what I was doing I couldn't understand why well lit, tripod shots of stationary objects were softer at f32 than f22 on my Sigma 105mm.
__________________ [URL=http://pendery.org]My photos [/URL] |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 14 members and 101 guests | | Astra, BarbaraEmma, caernerch, Cowgirl, Dan Salter, davecatt, Doggle Avaddit, Dutchess, jonbem, ladyhawk, reino, RKB, SusieBee, widiot | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | New Job! Yesterday 10:57 PM 18 Replies, 147 Views | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |