| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
| |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
| |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
| |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
| |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| 1 | 2 | 3 | » Stats |
Members: 48,650
Threads: 78,882
Posts: 821,331
Top Poster: glsammy (14,777) | | Welcome to our newest member, megzie1991 | |  | | 
12-01-2008, 05:59 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Small North Lincolnshire village
Posts: 9,436
| | | Re: Iso 1600 Quote:
Originally Posted by d70mpv Jeff that link is just fantastic, thanks a great deal for that. Andy Rouse mentioned the same about ISO-fear at the talk I went to i.e. don't be afraid to go high if you need to, better to get a sharp shot than not. He showed a beauty of a bear shot, I seem to remember that was taken at ISO 6400!
The one thing I would say is that I think both the article and certainly Rouse are using full frame cameras. Roger are you using a full frame or crop? Hopefully the newer crops (40D et al) may make up a little for their small sensor sizes with improved high-ISO-handling technology. | Mine is the 400D with the 1.6 crop factor sensor
Roger | 
12-01-2008, 06:21 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 1,122
| | | Re: Iso 1600 I tried it today thats till I knocked it of AV to TV with out realising  It a shame as I went to a local wood armed with a handfull of food pinched of our the african grey. Waited and might have got some good shots of a Nuthatch if i had checked the camera,
The Robin was taken at 1600 iso deep in the wood freehand.
The nuthatch shot in TV as i must have caught it by mistake still theres next time
__________________ Don't just talk the talk :) walk the Walk. | 
12-01-2008, 07:08 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: near Cambridge
Posts: 2,003
| | | Re: Iso 1600 Quote:
Originally Posted by d70mpv Jeff that link is just fantastic, thanks a great deal for that........ | It's a pleasure.....  - as you may have seen, that website has lots of good hints and tips and how nice to see a Pro sharing such info with us amateurs in such an accessible (and free  ) manner.
Jeff | 
13-01-2008, 12:14 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Kingswood, Surrey.
Posts: 44
| | | Re: Iso 1600 Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffH It's a pleasure.....  - as you may have seen, that website has lots of good hints and tips and how nice to see a Pro sharing such info with us amateurs in such an accessible (and free  ) manner.
Jeff | May I offer my thanks for the link too, it is a pleasure to read a professionals view on varied points. | 
31-01-2008, 05:29 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,777
| | | Re: Iso 1600 I was at Sherwood Forest again today. I decided to try again with a few high ISO 1600 shots.
Here's some of them:
This one was a must stiffer test, as the background is quite dark.
Yet again I think decent results from high iso in good light.
There was noise of course, but it certainly hasn't destroyed the subjects. | 
31-01-2008, 05:54 PM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 381
| | | Re: Iso 1600 wish I could get photos like that in any light....at any iso.
Jon | 
31-01-2008, 06:24 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Kirk Michael, Isle of Man.
Posts: 1,180
| | | Re: Iso 1600 so do I! | 
31-01-2008, 06:33 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,777
| | | Re: Iso 1600 If you look at the second shot, I've left a small section on the bottom right hand side where I haven't removed the background noise. | 
31-01-2008, 06:56 PM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 381
| | | Re: Iso 1600 Aha - I can see that now. Did you use Neat Image to remove the noise on the rest of the image?
It is a great shot.
jon | 
31-01-2008, 07:03 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,777
| | | Re: Iso 1600 Quote:
Originally Posted by JonSadler Aha - I can see that now. Did you use Neat Image to remove the noise on the rest of the image?
It is a great shot.
jon | Yes. Mind you I do that with most images. If the background is light enough I don't have to, the procedures in Lightroom deal with it perfectly well, but where the background is dark, it still needs a little after work. Neat image was only used on the dark background, nowhere else. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 25 members and 295 guests | | Adam Cheeseman, blackb1rd, Coventry Lee, Ditiola, Dogghound, earthdragon64, ellen h, GTH, Hedgehoggy, hillrover, John D, Jonners, Juliet1200, Kayleigh, Kevin Lawson, Ladywell, Mikeakabigman, RaptorMan101, Richard Baber, shenk1, squishy, teenielux, Tringa, waxcap, Weedy | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |