| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,189
Threads: 82,437
Posts: 853,850
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, VickyFysh | |  | | 
15-04-2006, 05:49 PM
|  | Frozen | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Somerset, UK
Posts: 497
| | | Re: Camera Choices Quote: |
Originally Posted by Klewis The 18-55mm lens makes a good doorstop!. Buy the body only option and then select a good lens to match it. My 18-55mm has been taken out the box once held it in my hand and put it back in the box it is horrible! Yes you can take reasonable pictures with it but you may as well stick to the fuji which will give better results than the 18-55mm | Having looked at the original sized images for the Fuji on dpreview and compared them to similar shots I'd taken with the kit lens I'd have to disagree.
But maybe my method was flawed? Foolishly I put the lens on the camera to test it, rather than hold it in my hand
The kit lens isn't L glass but at it's price point it's performs well. | 
15-04-2006, 06:09 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 4,438
| | | Re: Camera Choices Quote: |
Originally Posted by pxl8 The kit lens isn't L glass but at it's price point it's performs well. | To be perfectly honest I only used the 18 - 55mm kit lens for test shots whilst getting used to the 20D and the results were not that bad, just not really impressive, my main gripe was that it is not that well made, it seems very cheap compared to the cameras with which it is sold.
My Sigma 150mm macro has not been off the camera since I had it, what a superb bit of kit
I may take it off if I can get my hands on an L series 400mm f 2.8 prime, all I need to do is win the lottery | 
15-04-2006, 10:12 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Gloucester
Posts: 1,375
| | | Re: Camera Choices You may well be right pxl8 but, imo, the build quality and feel of the 18-55 is absolutely appalling by Canon standards, even for a budget lens, and instantly gave me zero confidence in it's capability. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 16 members and 303 guests | | AlanJenkins, blackb1rd, Bladderwort, Bruce Williams, ChrisJB, gobbiner, GuyF, Ilex, Johnny81, Pepsis, Pete Collins, rmc, rogpow, shenk1, solus, tigertom | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! 01-06-2012 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 201 Views | | | | | |