Go Back   Wildlife and Environment Forums > Outdoor Activities > Wildlife Photography

Closed Thread

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2007, 11:37 AM
StuartDH's Avatar
Administrator and Commander of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: On the Malvern Hills
Posts: 3,533
Re: Commercial Activity

We delete quite a lot of spam and adverts on here, and we've also binned some obvious new member "where can I buy" questions that had answers from new members with "the best place is...". We've recently received a complaint from someone telling us to level the playing field on 'free ads' and basically allow them to post, or they'll report us to the charity commission. With regards to PMs, they've apparently been given PM recommendations that gave 'biased' support for some suppliers and 'unfair' criticism of others.

Their complaint is that we delete some recommendation threads, but apparently allow others to promote suppliers on the site, so in effect we must be endorsing or looking after these suppliers. They've also made the insinuation that we must be getting well looked after by these suppliers to let them get away with it.

Personally, I've put a massive amount of time, money and effort into WAB and I doubt that the total benefit from sales on all of the recommendations on every thread on the site would add up to what I've put in over the past 2/3 years. Wild About Britain doesn't benefit from any way of the recommendations on the forums, and nor do any of the trustees. If anything the charity loses out as the suppliers don't have to pay through the usual google adverts to get publicity.

So to level the playing field we've got one of two options; heavily restrict the use of supplier recommendations, or allow every ebay trader, retailer etc to use the site as a place to post free ads in forum threads (including the more discreet "where can I buy..." spam). There's no way the second one is going to happen, so we're going with option one.

As I've said above, we'll allow the occasional post of a recommendation for a supplier, but if it looks anything like one supplier is getting too much publicity on the site then we won't hesitate in deleting all references. If you need to make a recommendation, wherever possible, please be vague enough to not specify a single supplier.

As said before, everything in moderation. We'd certainly never allow every post to include a recommendation, and it appears that even the amount we had before was too much for some. However, we don't expect there to never be any more recommendations, so I'd simply ask that we keep it to an absolute minimum and fair for everyone. That said, if a recommendation for one supplier is soon jumped on by lots of other suppliers who post (or it looks like others are posting on their behalf) to also recommend them, then the thread will probably be binned.

As for the charity situation. Wild About Britain is a registered charity, which provides us with some benefits, but it also means that we're subject to many extra laws, rules, regulations, public accountability and scrutiny by the Charity Commission. This means that we can't always run the site in the same as we maybe would if it belonged to us personally. It means that we can't support commercial activity where the charity doesn't gain anything in return, so obviously adverts and sponsorship are OK.

First and foremost we have to protect the interests of the charity and then we have to ensure that we're serving the true beneficiarie; and that doesn't extend to helping out suppliers who can potentially make a lot of money out of the site and in no way contribute anything in return.

Stu
__________________
Warning! This website may contain nuts!

Wild About The World
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2007, 01:37 PM
eeyore's Avatar
Knight Commander of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chilterns
Posts: 8,039
Re: Commercial Activity

I understand what you say stu and will obviously abide by the new rules but my opinion is that there is a third way - we could ban spam and overt advertising but still allow supplier recommendations from established members as there is a difference between a supplier posting to recomend themselves and a member posting to reccomend someone who has given good service / price /deal

My opinion is that recommendations are not advertsising they are advice to other members which is a large part of what the forum is for - if the complainers wish to be recomended in the same way they would then only have to offer the same excellent service as the people who have been previously reccomended. - still I guess the complainers(whoever they are) will reap what they sow as now even if they give one of us a keen deal and outstanding service then we wont be able to reccomend them to anyone else.

I am still suprised about the PM issue though - I cant see how wab would be anymore liable for what a member writes in pm than google are for what someone writes in their google mail

But at the end of the day I recognise that this is only my opinion and it is not for me to make the rules, and although I might do it differently if it were , in this as in every other case I support stu's decision 100%
__________________
"new improved eeyore , now with added tact..... for that whiter brighter finish"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2007, 03:06 PM
agrumpycow's Avatar
Commander of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: My head's in a lush, isolated valley, but I can't seem to escape Reading!
Posts: 1,828
Send a message via MSN to agrumpycow
Re: Commercial Activity

Quote:
Originally Posted by eeyore View Post
I understand what you say stu and will obviously abide by the new rules but my opinion is that there is a third way - we could ban spam and overt advertising but still allow supplier recommendations from established members as there is a difference between a supplier posting to recomend themselves and a member posting to reccomend someone who has given good service / price /deal
But how could that be achieved without a huge amount of time and effort by the mods? And what would you define as 'established members'?
__________________
Claire x
All I can do is be me, whoever that is - Bob Dylan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2007, 07:33 PM
eeyore's Avatar
Knight Commander of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chilterns
Posts: 8,039
Re: Commercial Activity

Quote:
Originally Posted by agrumpycow View Post
And what would you define as 'established members'?
the general rule is 25 posts - as in the right to add signatures etc , and the mods already put a huge ammount of time into deleting spam adverts. But I probably shouldnt have posted that above - it would have been better in a pm to stu.

At the end of the day admin make the rules and the rest of us play by them so i'm not going to argue the toss on this subject anymore as i dont want to make stu anymore work.
__________________
"new improved eeyore , now with added tact..... for that whiter brighter finish"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2007, 08:58 AM
pressld2's Avatar
Commander of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Belvedere, Kent
Posts: 2,306
Re: Commercial Activity

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaiTheDragon View Post
Does this work both ways. If a post is made giving information about a disreputable retailer or one that has continually given bad service, is that wrong also.
I don't quite understand how the site is a charity, could Stu give a brief rundown on how it works.

Dai
I was wondering that too. I recently received absolutely atrocious service from a well known Internet supplier and said so in a forum post, advising others not to use them. Is this still allowed?

Dave P.
__________________
"Everywhere I turn, all the beauty just keeps shaking me." - Amy Ray
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:02 AM
StuartDH's Avatar
Administrator and Commander of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: On the Malvern Hills
Posts: 3,533
Re: Commercial Activity

Again, everything in moderation. I think it'll be OK to add the odd reference, but if there are 100+ posts that give the same supplier a bad review (like there were 100+ posts that praised one supplier in the forums) then we might expect to get complaints from them.
__________________
Warning! This website may contain nuts!

Wild About The World
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:21 AM
StuartDH's Avatar
Administrator and Commander of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: On the Malvern Hills
Posts: 3,533
Re: Commercial Activity

Quote:
Originally Posted by eeyore View Post
I understand what you say stu and will obviously abide by the new rules but my opinion is that there is a third way - we could ban spam and overt advertising but still allow supplier recommendations from established members as there is a difference between a supplier posting to recomend themselves and a member posting to reccomend someone who has given good service / price /deal

My opinion is that recommendations are not advertsising they are advice to other members which is a large part of what the forum is for - if the complainers wish to be recomended in the same way they would then only have to offer the same excellent service as the people who have been previously reccomended. - still I guess the complainers(whoever they are) will reap what they sow as now even if they give one of us a keen deal and outstanding service then we wont be able to reccomend them to anyone else.

I am still suprised about the PM issue though - I cant see how wab would be anymore liable for what a member writes in pm than google are for what someone writes in their google mail

But at the end of the day I recognise that this is only my opinion and it is not for me to make the rules, and although I might do it differently if it were , in this as in every other case I support stu's decision 100%

I don't think the third way would work, because it would just give some members the facillity to make recommendations and not others, and that's not a level field. Also, the complaint was basically directed at established members adding the reviews, and new members not being able to do the same.

One or two recommendations isn't necessarily advertising, but I've spent hours going through lots of recommendations for one supplier after it was pointed out that it looks a lot like 'adverts on behalf of...'.

With regards to PM, WAB has a responsibility if we knowingly allow it to go on. It would be ridiculous to stop it in the forum, but feel free to do it when nobody is watching via our PM system.

The fact is, for the sake of some recommendations I'm simply not willing to put any aspect of this charity at risk, just so that a member can save a couple of quid, a supplier will give bigger discounts, or another can make more sales. It should be enough to say 'look on ebay' or 'some garden centres have...' without giving the name/webpage/email address/phone number of a particular supplier dozens of times each month.

The major beneficiary here are the recommended suppliers, who have literally been laughing all the way to bank. Some members might save a couple of quid by getting a bit of a discount. But all the charity gettings is grief.

So the forum rule, which is pretty much the same as it's always been, is now: 'You may not advertise any products, services or suppliers.' Everything in moderation, and obviously it's down to the moderators to decide if it's a recommendation or advertising, but members can expect a warning and/or being banned if we feel that they are breaking the rule.

Stu
__________________
Warning! This website may contain nuts!

Wild About The World
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread  

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Online Users: 76

10 members and 66 guests
>>> Click Here to become a member...it's completely free!
bfor, cybershot, GerryNick2, goosey, Hedge Witch, John, johnwray205, PMG, RobSutton, SilverW0lf
Most users ever online was 3,128, 24-07-2008 at 09:12 PM.

» WAB Development Posts

No Threads to Display.

» New Wildlife Posts

Go to first new post Sunrise or Sunset?
Last post by Hedge Witch
Today 07:17 AM
1 Replies, 12 Views
Go to first new post finding frogs
Last post by bfor
Today 07:10 AM
7 Replies, 73 Views
Go to first new post Nuthatch and Others
Last post by Hedge Witch
Today 07:08 AM
10 Replies, 59 Views
Go to first new post Sparrowhawk versus...
Last post by Hedge Witch
Today 07:05 AM
5 Replies, 51 Views
Go to first new post Tawny Owl Box advice...
Last post by Hedge Witch
Today 06:58 AM
9 Replies, 69 Views
Go to first new post Ladybird nest
Last post by Wild-Woman
Today 06:36 AM
16 Replies, 149 Views
Go to first new post Bullace - Damson?
Last post by Hobjob
Today 06:23 AM
25 Replies, 219 Views
Go to first new post Fungi ID
Last post by solus
Today 02:03 AM
9 Replies, 132 Views

» New Environment Posts

Go to first new post What do you do with...
Last post by annes
Today 05:26 AM
4 Replies, 49 Views
Go to first new post Vegetarianism and Global...
Last post by svenrufus
Yesterday 11:58 PM
46 Replies, 657 Views
Go to first new post Public Transport
Last post by PMG
Yesterday 11:11 PM
77 Replies, 1,890 Views
Go to first new post Chemical Toilet
Last post by nightshade
Yesterday 05:28 PM
9 Replies, 123 Views

» New Activity Posts

Go to first new post Upland Birds in Yorkshire
Last post by BillyPilgrim
Today 12:50 AM
1 Replies, 25 Views
Go to first new post Anyone with a Canon 40D
Last post by Deer Hunter
Yesterday 11:37 PM
53 Replies, 562 Views
Go to first new post What DSLR?
Last post by eeyore
Yesterday 08:56 PM
33 Replies, 436 Views
Go to first new post sigma 50-500mm and...
Last post by eeyore
Yesterday 08:39 PM
10 Replies, 245 Views

» New Community Posts

Go to first new post Bill Oddie
Last post by tcvarlh
Today 04:28 AM
8 Replies, 310 Views
Go to first new post I know its still a month...
Last post by sunnydale
Yesterday 11:10 PM
41 Replies, 285 Views
Go to first new post Music that moves us
Last post by sunnydale
Yesterday 11:03 PM
219 Replies, 3,187 Views
Go to first new post BBC looking for Wildlife...
Last post by ellen h
Yesterday 10:27 PM
72 Replies, 1,852 Views

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Copyright Wild About Britain 2008

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401