| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,186
Threads: 82,433
Posts: 853,796
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, newy | | 
11-06-2007, 08:33 AM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 262
| | | Re: Which Lens Quote:
Originally Posted by Oy Ignoring the sidetracking Canonites for a second
The Nikon 300mm F4 plus x1.4 TC would be a great bet for birds. At 420mm it would certainly outperform lenses like the Bigma - even when cropped to an equivalent 500mm. | The Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/4 is an excellent optic, even when used wide open, plus it has the ability to focus down to around five feet: handy for close-up shooting (although not 1:1 ratio unaided). Used with the Nikkor TC-14E II, you have a versatile setup. Also, build is first class, the lens barrel being metal (not plastic).
I used one for 16 months, but recently upgraded to the 300mmf/2.8 AF-S VR IF-ED. Having said that, I'm keeping the f/4, as it's just so good.
HW | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 16 members and 286 guests | | AfternoonLemon, Anders152, gobbiner, Hedera, leon_heller, NickCantle, nursiebernard, nutmeg, Omi, Pepsis, shenk1, tigertom, UB4 gardener, Ukwildlifeo, waxcap | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 199 Views | | | | | |