| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,186
Threads: 82,433
Posts: 853,796
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, newy | |  | | 
18-03-2007, 06:49 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Felixstowe
Posts: 1,652
| | | Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? I've been doing some work in a friend's new garden. At one end of the garden, in an area destined to become a woodland/wildlife garden, the previous owner planted a weeping form of Goat willow ( Salix caprea) known, I believe, as "Kilmarnock" willow. Personally, I detest these grotesque, stunted, virus-ridden distortions of nature and, from an aesthetic point of view, would be happy to get rid of it (my friend isn't bothered either way). However, S. caprea is a good wildlife plant (the bees have been enjoying the catkins recently) and I'm reluctant to uproot it unnecessarily, so I'd like to make use of it if I can.
My question is: what would be the effect of coppicing it? Would it revert to type, and send vertical shoots up from the base, or would the weeping habit manifest itself at ground level?
Or would something else entirely happen? Any thoughts?
Also, is S. caprea the only species of willow to be misused this way?
Cheers
T2
__________________ Your karma has just run over my dogma. | 
18-03-2007, 07:40 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: N.E.SOMERSET
Posts: 9,045
| | | Re: Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? If the owner is not really bothered try it,my inlaws willow never wept again
after being cut back
__________________ Your garden their refuge, a jig-saw of habitats for wildlife under pressure | 
18-03-2007, 08:46 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 100
| | | Re: Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? I believe the Kilmarnock Willow is a weeping form of grey sallow (Salix cinerea) grafted on a standard. Coppicing it will result in stems which will not have weeping branches. Personally I agree with you that they look horrible, but if you do coppice it there might be the danger of the roots of the rootstock reverting to type and going crazy (Kilmarnock Willows do not have a very vigorous root system). | 
18-03-2007, 09:34 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Felixstowe
Posts: 1,652
| | | Re: Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? Quote:
Originally Posted by m1keanderson I believe the Kilmarnock Willow is a weeping form of grey sallow (Salix cinerea) grafted on a standard. Coppicing it will result in stems which will not have weeping branches. Personally I agree with you that they look horrible, but if you do coppice it there might be the danger of the roots of the rootstock reverting to type and going crazy (Kilmarnock Willows do not have a very vigorous root system). | Thanks m1keanderson. It still has the label on, and I'm 95% sure it said "Salix caprea"; not that it matters, "cinerea" would be equally acceptable.
How "crazy" is "crazy"? Do you mean it might start sending up suckers all over the place? That could be a problem. It might have to go.
Cheers
Tursiops2
__________________ Your karma has just run over my dogma. | 
18-03-2007, 10:48 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 100
| | | Re: Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? My apologies - it is Salix caprea. Suckering isn't the problem, rather their ability to seek out sources of water. I have seen roots 'fur up' sewerage pipes and some have an extensive, wide, shallow root system that can suck the life out of your lawn. Then, of course, there's the subsidence (neighbour's house within 40m?).... | 
18-03-2007, 11:17 PM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Northants.
Posts: 11,628
| | | Re: Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? I planted a native Salix caprea ( pussy willow) last year as the catkins are food for bees. Mine has not got the weeping habit. I was told I could keep it small by pruning it. The Kilmarnock is a ornamental type so like m1 said it was grafted on a standard rootstock so will not come back as a weeping tree. I thought it was only the large weeping willows that caused problems with water pipes and not the ornamental type. I mat be wrong. | 
19-03-2007, 12:15 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Felixstowe
Posts: 1,652
| | | Re: Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? Quote:
Originally Posted by m1keanderson Suckering isn't the problem, | That's a relief, I've got enough problems in that area with rampant couch grass (ex-vegetable plot, untouched for 6 years+) without willow suckers all over the place! Quote:
Originally Posted by m1keanderson rather their ability to seek out sources of water. I have seen roots 'fur up' sewerage pipes and some have an extensive, wide, shallow root system that can suck the life out of your lawn. Then, of course, there's the subsidence (neighbour's house within 40m?).... | The nearest house is my friend's at 25m, with new patio and outbuilding planned at ca. 20m.
The soil is light, slightly sandy, well-drained, fertile. Will this inhibit or stimulate root growth?
Will regular (yearly?) coppicing (i.e. severe pruning, Cf. Kayleigh's post) keep it under control?
__________________ Your karma has just run over my dogma. | 
19-03-2007, 06:42 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 100
| | | Re: Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? We're moving into hazy-memory territory here...
The Kilmarnock does have a relatively weak root system but from what I remember it is the scion (the grafted top part) that keeps this in check. Once this is removed the tree becomes whatever variety the rootstock is and that's when problems can occur. With any tree where there might be an issue with vigorous roots then root pruning is an option worth considering.
My guess regarding the soil is that the willow will not like it at all unless there is a water supply it can readily tap into (pipe/water table) and will sulk, be prone to disease and liable to blow over if allowed to grow to any decent size. Hopefully, someone with more experience of this type of soil will be able to give you a definitive answer (Northants is mainly clay so my experience is limited).
So, what to do? Give it a try - anything has got to be better than having a Kilmarnock Willow
p.s. Can sympathise with you on couch grass. | 
19-03-2007, 10:26 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Grantham, Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,928
| | | Re: Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? Why don't you just leave it. It will still support wildlife whether its a Kilmarnock or not and you will have the benefit of the roots being kept in check. | 
20-03-2007, 12:58 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Felixstowe
Posts: 1,652
| | | Re: Kilmarnock willow - worth coppicing? Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance Morgan Why don't you just leave it. It will still support wildlife whether its a Kilmarnock or not and you will have the benefit of the roots being kept in check.  | Fair comment. My objection to the plant is really only on aesthetic grounds - plans for that area aren't finalised, but it's likely to be a semi-natural, woodland/orchard/wildlife area, and I think it would look out-of-place in that setting, in its present form.
As it happens, work in that area has just been put on hold while other things take priority, so it'll probably be another year before I/we have to make any decision.
I was curious about the effects of coppicing though, and the feedback has been useful.
Many thanks
Tursiops2
__________________ Your karma has just run over my dogma. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 15 members and 214 guests | | Anders152, gobbiner, Hedera, Jason Green, leon_heller, NickCantle, nursiebernard, nutmeg, Omi, paulinemiller10, shenk1, tigertom, Trekkie, UB4 gardener, Ukwildlifeo | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 199 Views | | | | | |