| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,186
Threads: 82,432
Posts: 853,790
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, newy | |  | 
01-02-2010, 08:29 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Co. Kerry, Ireland - by the sea
Posts: 169
| | | Re: can you id the plant specimens on these two spode plates the one on the right looks like a kind of bell heather but upside down and a bit weird...or maybe something like bilberry/whortleberry? | 
01-02-2010, 09:11 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2,983
| | | Re: can you id the plant specimens on these two spode plates If you have access to these, can you get a better photo of a full leaf and it's connection to a stem, and a full view of the flower? Like so many things that get photo-ed, the level of detail is not aimed at IDing the plant
__________________ Genio Terrę Britannicę | 
01-02-2010, 09:35 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Bridport, Dorset.
Posts: 663
| | | Re: can you id the plant specimens on these two spode plates The plant on the left could be Pheasant Berry, Leycestera formosa. | 
02-02-2010, 09:20 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,066
| | | Re: can you id the plant specimens on these two spode plates Quote:
Originally Posted by parrot10blue I am researching this china pattern and am trying to find all of the items in the set that were made. I need a way to identify each piece in the set and since the plant species were not named on the plates I need to find there names so I can use this as a form of identification for each item. | You are making the assumption that what is depicted is a botanically accurate representation of a specific plant. While the decorator no doubt had specimens to work from, there's no reason to believe that botanical accuracy was being sought, and it is far more likely that an idealised image was created to meet decorative sensibilities. Some ceramicists certainly prided themselves on achieving life representations of plants but the Spode tradition doesn't seem to include that to any significant degree.
Unless you have some background on the particular decorator and how they worked, looking to match the plate images to a species is probably a fruitless task. I would suggest your research would be better rewarded by approaching the Spode society.
CM |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 21 members and 248 guests | | Action_Man, Bob Fleming, Dorts, Farplace, flaxton, Hedera, htcdude, Jason Green, leon_heller, nursiebernard, nutmeg, paulinemiller10, pressld2, shenk1, Sultan, thunder, tigertom, Ukwildlifeo, waxcap, welsh.lensman, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 199 Views | | | | | |