| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,187
Threads: 82,434
Posts: 853,804
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Della | |  | | 
13-05-2010, 09:14 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: nottingham
Posts: 1,428
| | | flowers for identification/confirmation I enjoyed a nice sunny walk around the 'rock' cemetery in nottingham yesterday after noticing that there seemed to be lots of plants in flower when i walked past the previous evening.
saw a few which i'm not entirely sure of, and can't really find them in books.
step in knowledgable wabbers!!! just a few! thanks in advance!
i think this is pignut, the basal leaves were absent, leaving only the thin ones on the stem. opinions?
not a clue, lots of this about
this was growing on a wall, flower looks like wild strawberry, but i'm quite sure it isnt, although i'm not sure what it is???
__________________ http://beardybirder.blogspot.com
http://nottsflowers.blogspot.com/ | 
14-05-2010, 12:18 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Bandit country between Offa's Dyke and Welsh border
Posts: 743
| | | Re: flowers for identification/confirmation 1. Looks quite like pignut but seems very tall in the photo. Could be Burnet Saxifrage.
2. Probably Common Mouse-ear.
3. Barren Strawberry.
John | 
14-05-2010, 10:36 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: nottingham
Posts: 1,428
| | | Re: flowers for identification/confirmation the first was only about 30cm tall, had to get 'horizontal' to get a good shot! cheers for the other IDs too, look about right!
__________________ http://beardybirder.blogspot.com
http://nottsflowers.blogspot.com/ | 
14-05-2010, 10:44 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 951
| | | Re: flowers for identification/confirmation Yeah, wouldn`t disagree with Pignut for the first. Common Mouse Ear for the second and the last is just a daisy with a deformity (probably been sprayed lasy year) Oh! I forgot, wild strwberry would work fine for the other one.
Thanks,
Dave | 
14-05-2010, 01:45 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Bandit country between Offa's Dyke and Welsh border
Posts: 743
| | | Re: flowers for identification/confirmation Quote:
Originally Posted by thebeard the first was only about 30cm tall, had to get 'horizontal' to get a good shot! cheers for the other IDs too, look about right! | OK - 30cm tall, definitely Pignut. | 
14-05-2010, 01:48 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: nottingham
Posts: 1,428
| | | Re: flowers for identification/confirmation ta folks!
__________________ http://beardybirder.blogspot.com
http://nottsflowers.blogspot.com/ | 
14-05-2010, 01:48 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Bandit country between Offa's Dyke and Welsh border
Posts: 743
| | | Re: flowers for identification/confirmation Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdave60dog Yeah, wouldn`t disagree with Pignut for the first. Common Mouse Ear for the second and the last is just a daisy with a deformity (probably been sprayed lasy year) Oh! I forgot, wild strwberry would work fine for the other one.
Thanks,
Dave | No - I'm sure that's Barren Strawberry. Sepals longer than petals and clearly showing. Mat, downy rather than glossy leaves.
John | 
14-05-2010, 04:18 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 42
| | | Re: flowers for identification/confirmation You might want to consider Sticky Mouse-ear (Cerastium glomeratum)
for the second. It looks like an erect plant with compact heads of flowers that are not opening - both features reminisent of that species | 
14-05-2010, 08:50 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Bandit country between Offa's Dyke and Welsh border
Posts: 743
| | | Re: flowers for identification/confirmation Quote:
Originally Posted by Stark You might want to consider Sticky Mouse-ear (Cerastium glomeratum)
for the second. It looks like an erect plant with compact heads of flowers that are not opening - both features reminisent of that species | Hmmm - I thought about Sticky but just didn't seem quite compact and "sticky" enough. But not sure, hence the "probably" Common M-e. You could be right though | 
15-05-2010, 08:02 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 951
| | | Re: flowers for identification/confirmation I would consider whatever you like but I will stick to my ID unless I have one in my hand. To try to differentiate from those pics is a bit unrealistic. (could well be Barren Strawberry though)
Dave |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 0 members and 178 guests | | No Members online | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! 01-06-2012 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 199 Views | | | | | |