| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,176
Threads: 82,393
Posts: 853,582
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Songbirdsteve | |  | | 
16-05-2008, 09:05 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Kensworth, Bedfordshire (W/ends) and Huntingdon
Posts: 4,338
| | | Roach?
Sorry for the poor quality photo! Are these small fish roach? They seem to have some red on their fins.
They were in the river Misbourne at Old Amersham on Wednesday.
Thanks for your help.
Pete | 
16-05-2008, 10:43 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Northants.
Posts: 11,628
| | | Re: Roach? I think they may be Rudd fish | 
16-05-2008, 10:53 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: North Yorkshire ( Gods Country )
Posts: 1,217
| | | Re: Roach? I would say they are roach, The fins do not seem red enough for them to be rudd, Also there overall profile and colouration would suggest roach, and also importantly the fact they are in a river rather than still water would say roach rather than rudd,,,,,
Andy
__________________ A pretty face is fine but what a farmer needs is a woman that can carry a pig under each arm | 
16-05-2008, 10:54 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Northants.
Posts: 11,628
| | | Re: Roach? Quote:
Originally Posted by coasty I would say they are roach, The fins do not seem red enough for them to be rudd, Also there overall profile and colouration would suggest roach, and also importantly the fact they are in a river rather than still water would say roach rather than rudd,,,,,
Andy | OK I stand corrected  | 
16-05-2008, 11:30 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Kensworth, Bedfordshire (W/ends) and Huntingdon
Posts: 4,338
| | | Re: Roach? Thank you both very much.
When I typed in the bit about red fins, I did suddenly wonder if they were Rudd! But I'd seen a photo of Roach in the Gallery that looked similar, so I stuck with my first guess.
I was just impressed that the water was so clean and that the fish actually showed up in the photo! Actually I was quite pleased to see water there, as most times I've walked through Old Amersham the river's been dry. | 
16-05-2008, 01:49 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: North Yorkshire ( Gods Country )
Posts: 1,217
| | | Re: Roach? Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayleigh OK I stand corrected   | Only my opinion but very graciously put,,,,,  
__________________ A pretty face is fine but what a farmer needs is a woman that can carry a pig under each arm | 
17-05-2008, 10:02 AM
|  | New Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: soutwest wiltshire
Posts: 17
| | | Re: Roach? could be a hybrid of the two,theyre notorious for it and the only way to tell for sure would be to count the scales on the lateral line.
and looking closer at the image ,the mouth is upward pointing which is predominantly a rudd feature.
Last edited by fish; 17-05-2008 at 10:04 AM.
| 
17-05-2008, 10:23 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Kensworth, Bedfordshire (W/ends) and Huntingdon
Posts: 4,338
| | | Re: Roach? Thanks very much, fish!
Amazing what you can learn on WAB! I know very little about fish, although I did go fishing a few times when I was a boy (about the middle of the last century!  )
The picture obviously isn't too good for identification purposes, so I'll just say they're roach, rudd or a hybrid of them. I was just interested as they obviously weren't Sticklebacks, and I was pleasantly surprised to see any fish at all as the river is often dry at that point.
Thanks again for everybody's comments,
Pete
Last edited by Pete Collins; 17-05-2008 at 10:48 AM.
Reason: Corrected typo - it's traditional to have two m's in 'comment'
| 
17-05-2008, 10:27 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grimsby, Lincs
Posts: 1,645
| | | Re: Roach? Roach in my opinion
Roach/rudd hybids aren't that common in my experience, certainly not like Roach/Bream | 
18-05-2008, 06:31 AM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 82
| | | Re: Roach? Very definitely roach. I was photographing some myself recently in a local pond. ( also ex super keen angler, saw thousands of them)
Roach-rudd hybrids, although fairly rare, can be locally common. I used to catch both rudd and roach-rudd hybrids in the Lake District. The hybrids outnumbered the pure rudd. Never caught a true roach in the water, but it was a big water, and they were probably elsewhere. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 21 members and 299 guests | | alandebenham, Arjaydee, cgf1957, Closescapes, Deb London, heron09, htcdude, Indian Joe, jaguarondi, Joel.W, King Edward, nick5943, paulinemiller10, Pepsis, Pete Collins, rich ard, shenk1, Songbirdsteve, speyghillie, tjhavenith, waxcap | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 192 Views | | | | | |