| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,176
Threads: 82,393
Posts: 853,580
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Songbirdsteve | | 
02-08-2008, 07:05 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Barnsley
Posts: 1,729
| | | Re: Butterfly's and Moth (ers) TV BBC4 7:30 Quote:
Originally Posted by djackso We didn't like the bit were he killed them then cut off their genitals. My other half was disgusted.  | I think that it would have been a bit of a cop-out not to have shown that (faked or not); it's what the top men do after all. | 
02-08-2008, 07:16 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: NWLondon
Posts: 960
| | | Re: Butterfly's and Moth (ers) TV BBC4 7:30 I find it very hard to believe there isn't a more scientific way based on DNA. Not that expensive these days. Must be more reliable. Whether the moth needs to die or not.
Oh well, the arguments against will be the expense, esp. the initial outlay designing and testing suitable primers, lack of lab facilities etc, etc.
But I have a feeling the depth of knowledge gained would be vast. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 18 members and 319 guests | | Adam Cheeseman, alandebenham, Arjaydee, Bob Fleming, Closescapes, Deb London, Dorts, Gerel, gobbiner, GuyF, heron09, Joel.W, MP, reefbirder, Songbirdsteve, squishy, tigertom, willowjay | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 192 Views | | | | | |