| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,169
Threads: 82,383
Posts: 853,520
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, worrit | |  | | 
02-02-2011, 08:26 AM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Dorset
Posts: 298
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... There'd be brambles everywhere I reckon. | 
02-02-2011, 08:44 AM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: West Wales
Posts: 105
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... A fascinating topic Deb, thanks for bringing it up. Quote:
Originally Posted by Deb London So if the countryside was left to its own devices, let's say for 1000 years, is it fair to say that many species would die out? | If you removed all human activity, including grazing by sheep, then the landscape would certainly change radically due to the loss of grassland, which isn't a natural feature but one that exists largely due to humans. Woodland would eventually predominate and get more homogeneous, with the trees suited to the soil and climate in a particular region out-competing all others.
It's a reminder that the huge variety of plants, animals and insects that we have in the UK are a result of human activity, not something that exists despite us. | 
02-02-2011, 09:43 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 828
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... Quote: |
If you removed all human activity, including grazing by sheep, then the landscape would certainly change radically due to the loss of grassland, which isn't a natural feature but one that exists largely due to humans. Woodland would eventually predominate and get more homogeneous, with the trees suited to the soil and climate in a particular region out-competing all others.
| I wonder what effect this Woodland would have on Britains climate, i suppose it would become wetter? Quote: |
It's a reminder that the huge variety of plants, animals and insects that we have in the UK are a result of human activity, not something that exists despite us.
| Its surprising how many species are reliant on our activity here in Britian. I was recently going to start a thread, what species would we expect to dissapear or thrive in Britain if we to up and leave. We here so many comments that Humans are bad, we destroy so much. I'm not saying this ain't true, but there are some positive things we do. | 
02-02-2011, 11:06 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Snowdonia, N. Wales
Posts: 3,919
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... Quote:
Originally Posted by Deb London So if the countryside was left to its own devices, let's say for 1000 years, is it fair to say that many species would die out? | No, it is not fair to say that.
As I said Deb, almost all species will find a place somewhere.
Agreed that some now 'common' species may become far less so, but they will survive. Remember that all native species were here before man took control of our lands, some have benefited since, others have struggled.
I remember discussing this with an ecologist some years ago, I was wondering where chalk-grassland species would find a habitat, as at present such habitats are so 'man-managed', or arable weeds for example.
He suggested that chalk plants would still be found on the areas above and below chalk cliffs, and on clearings on chalk downland where no doubt Rabbits will still do plenty of grazing, just as they do today; and arable weeds will thrive on ground disturbed by grazing animals, and on river-banks and around 'cliff-falls'.
There is no reason to think that any species will be lost.
Dorts. | 
02-02-2011, 11:34 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: London
Posts: 4,916
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... What about animals? For example, I read that some of our butterflies need very specific requirements to survive.
__________________ Rejoicing in ordinary things is not sentimental or trite. It actually takes guts ― Pema Chödrön | 
02-02-2011, 12:43 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Near Peterborough
Posts: 7,107
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... I think its possible that alot of open habitats would remain so - where the grazing pressure is sufficent that is. Look at the plains of Africa and the Americas. Especially as the large predators are gone (except us) there wouldn't be a great deal to regulate the poplulations of ponies, deer etc. Deer are very good at removing saplings as are rabbits.
I think though yes species probably would be lost, those in isolated pockets of habitat with poor dispersal skills being most at risk.
__________________ ....I love not man the less, but Nature more.... | 
02-02-2011, 01:55 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: n.e.somerset
Posts: 3,222
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... The Saxon people had lot to answer for in clearing land.Should be interesting to see what was around then.
__________________ Once, I used to Ramble!
But now I just Amble. | 
02-02-2011, 02:04 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: West Wales
Posts: 105
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... Quote:
Originally Posted by artdemole The Saxon people had lot to answer for in clearing land.Should be interesting to see what was around then. | I don't know what the Saxons have got to do with it - woodland clearance started in the Neolithic age, accelerated in the Bronze age and by the end of the Iron age (circa 2000 BC) over 50% of Britain had been deforested (cf. Oliver Rackham). | 
02-02-2011, 02:49 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Soule Pays Basque France
Posts: 280
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... I imagine Britain would look like France and Germany do now in many areas Obviously altitude geology and rainfall will have a great effect
If there had been no boats perhaps a few million Elms
__________________ Tell me, and I shall forget, Show me, and I shall remember, Involve me, and I will understand
Last edited by basquesteve; 02-02-2011 at 02:53 PM.
| 
02-02-2011, 02:51 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: n.e.somerset
Posts: 3,222
| | | Re: If the countryside was allowed to revert back to forest... Lots of area were cleared By Saxons for their houses ,farmsteads.furniture ,tools and stockades.Hence the names of places ending in ley or leigh meaning a CLEARING...
__________________ Once, I used to Ramble!
But now I just Amble. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |