| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,177
Threads: 82,408
Posts: 853,663
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Ruralman | | 
19-02-2006, 12:53 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: N.E.SOMERSET
Posts: 9,045
| | | photographing trees While the leaves are (in most cases)still off the trees,are there any particular tree pics needed for the Gallery ?they can be pictured later with their "clothes on"to give a better guide perhaps
__________________ Your garden their refuge, a jig-saw of habitats for wildlife under pressure | 
19-02-2006, 03:22 PM
|  | Administrator and Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: On the Malvern Hills
Posts: 3,907
| | | Re: photographing trees Yep, definitely, we could always do with images for the reference section, especially where the tree is in isolation in a field etc, so we can clearly see it's shape.
We'll have a look through the current stock of images and see if we can maybe put together a matrix of missing images for each tree - i.e. buds, fruit, bark, leaves, nude, leafed etc
Stuart |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 17 members and 330 guests | | Chris Yeates, Dorts, GTH, jamicu, Ladywell, little_auk11, Morchella, Pete Collins, RMP234, shenk1, thunder, tigertom, treecreeper, waxcap, Who Me, WildlifeWatcher, willowjay | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 194 Views | | | | | |