| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,173
Threads: 82,386
Posts: 853,538
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, shipin | |  | 
11-08-2010, 11:45 AM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Dorset
Posts: 38
| | Atrax Robustus, or Segestria florentina? Has one of world's deadliest 'Funnel web' spiders been found in Gloucester? | Mail Online
So what do we think people? Has the Sydney Funnel-web found it's way to Britain?
Personally I doubt it, but the blurred picture doesn't help. All of the Sydney Funnel-web pics I can find show a much stouter spider with an unmarked abdomen. This specimen appears to have longer legs, although the marks on the abdomen could be abrasions of some kind.
As for the size, 1.5 inch, I always assume that alarmed people have over-estimated the spiders size, not at all uncommon. The Humming-bird Hawk Moth it's sitting on is supposed to have a body length of 21-25mm, so the spider looks to be smaller than that, certainly less than 1.5 inches!
Much as I doubt this is the famous Sydney Funnel-web, I'd like to see what everyone thinks. | 
11-08-2010, 04:26 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: SE Cornwall
Posts: 587
| | | Re: Atrax Robustus, or Segestria florentina? Looks more like Amaurobius ferox from that photo. Not Segestria I think, and not Atrax.
Last edited by John_M; 11-08-2010 at 04:29 PM.
| 
11-08-2010, 07:45 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Coast
Posts: 1,750
| | | Re: Atrax Robustus, or Segestria florentina? Quote:
Originally Posted by John_M Looks more like Amaurobius ferox from that photo. Not Segestria I think, and not Atrax. | lol seconds to that
Some journalist is going to feel like a right twit when they find out about this.
Thats said i'm sure the paper will just run another story with fearsome biter Amaurobius ferox new to our shores bla bla bla | 
11-08-2010, 08:00 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: SE Cornwall
Posts: 587
| | | Re: Atrax Robustus, or Segestria florentina? Quote:
Originally Posted by wildherbalian85 lol seconds to that
Some journalist is going to feel like a right twit when they find out about this.
Thats said i'm sure the paper will just run another story with fearsome biter Amaurobius ferox new to our shores bla bla bla | That's why it's called ferox! | 
11-08-2010, 08:28 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: South Coast
Posts: 1,750
| | | Re: Atrax Robustus, or Segestria florentina? Quote:
Originally Posted by John_M That's why it's called ferox!  | lol, until now i didn't know that ferox was latin for fearsome... what a choice for a word | 
11-08-2010, 09:45 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2,983
| | | Re: Atrax Robustus, or Segestria florentina? 't Mail.
__________________ Genio Terrę Britannicę | 
11-08-2010, 09:56 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,458
| | | Re: Atrax Robustus, or Segestria florentina? The 'Hummingbird Hawkmoth' is a Lime Hawkmoth too, not a great article all in all 
Guy | 
11-08-2010, 11:38 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Cheshire and North Wales
Posts: 1,125
| | | Re: Atrax Robustus, or Segestria florentina? Usual journalistic sensationalism - no change there surprise, surprise  .
No.9 Spider
__________________ Is man one of God's blunders? Or is God one of man's blunders?
Friedrich Nietzsche | 
12-08-2010, 04:30 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Dorset
Posts: 38
| | | Re: Atrax Robustus, or Segestria florentina? Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyF The 'Hummingbird Hawkmoth' is a Lime Hawkmoth too, not a great article all in all 
Guy | So our dear friends at the newspaper got the name of the moth wrong, and the breed of spider wrong twice. I suppose I shouldn't be too surprised!
Beautiful spider though, but I'm guessing the newspaper's readers probably wouldn't agree! |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 11 members and 237 guests | | GuyF, jeffnsue, johnwray205, katio3, keith llangollen, nursiebernard, shenk1, shipin, stewart, The Woodman, willowjay | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |