| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,172
Threads: 82,385
Posts: 853,535
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, lemajanyvb | |  | | 
01-07-2009, 07:25 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 3,607
| | | Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? First noticed this in the hall yesterday but didn't realize it was a spider (or anything else alive). Today noticed it had moved to different wall so thought I had better take a picture. It wasn't until I had downloaded the picture that I could see it was a spider.
I guess from the lumps on the back that it is Gibbaranea gibbosa, could anyone confirm this please. It was just over a mm long in it's hunched up state.
Thanks
Tig | 
01-07-2009, 07:34 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1,656
| | | Re: Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? Looks more like an Ero spp, can you get a moving shot? or at least less hunched?
__________________ You can't get 100% species confirmation from a photo - just a reminder. | 
01-07-2009, 07:37 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 3,607
| | | Re: Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? Quote:
Originally Posted by Venger Looks more like an Ero spp, can you get a moving shot? or at least less hunched? | That is certainly likely - see What is this?
I shall go and see what I can manage for a moving shot - I am still wimpish about spider - even when this tiny | 
01-07-2009, 08:06 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: N.W. Lancashire
Posts: 1,611
| | | Re: Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? Those bumps do look familiar, i have seen E. furcata but not E. cambridgei ... | 
01-07-2009, 08:21 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 3,607
| | | Re: Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? It gets quite a bit bigger when it stretches it's legs out | 
01-07-2009, 10:17 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1,656
| | | Re: Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? Interesting - I can see two sets of tubercles - which puts it either Ero tuberculatus (uncommon) or E.aphana (rare and highly unlikely).
Your not near any heather or heathland are you?
I'd like to see a top down or rear shot of the abdomen if you can?
__________________ You can't get 100% species confirmation from a photo - just a reminder. | 
02-07-2009, 05:16 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 3,607
| | | Re: Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? Quote:
Originally Posted by Venger Interesting - I can see two sets of tubercles - which puts it either Ero tuberculatus (uncommon) or E.aphana (rare and highly unlikely). | Yes definitely two sets of tubercles Quote:
Originally Posted by Venger Your not near any heather or heathland are you? | No - I am in urban Central London! It is possible that it could have hitched a ride in my luggage back from Canada I suppose, went through some heathy sorts of places there. Quote:
Originally Posted by Venger I'd like to see a top down or rear shot of the abdomen if you can? | Sorry these aren't too clear. I can try and refind it if neccessary | 
02-07-2009, 08:46 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Chiswick
Posts: 226
| | | Re: Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? Whilst I wouldn't like to venture an opinion, I have had Ero aphana from a couple of London locations (Middlesex - Ealing and Hounslow). I understand it has spread quite a bit recently, and is no longer confined to heathland. The last (possible) one I had escaped while I was photographing it. It looks very much like your specimen, perhaps it is the same one !!
I'll post a photo.
M. | 
02-07-2009, 08:58 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Chiswick
Posts: 226
| | | Re: Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? This is Ero aphana or tuberculata. It escaped from me due to a Blutack failure whilst being photographed. It came originally from the Brent Park in Hanwell, West London. I have found Ero aphana not far from here in the past (Horsenden Hill), but this one may well be Ero tuberculata.
Mick. | 
02-07-2009, 09:46 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1,656
| | | Re: Is this Gibbaranea gibbosa? Hi Mick, you don't have any other photos of this one do you? As I can only see 1 set of tubercles on it?
__________________ You can't get 100% species confirmation from a photo - just a reminder. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 17 members and 196 guests | | alindsay, ann_miles, Canon 4 Ade, earthdragon64, faz, Gill Catton, GuyF, jaybie, kathyheel, littlefire, nutmeg, oxycera, PMG, Ringo1968, roseway, stewart, welsh.lensman | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |