| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
| |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
| |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
| |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
| |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| 1 | 2 | 3 | » Stats |
Members: 48,644
Threads: 78,869
Posts: 821,194
Top Poster: glsammy (14,777) | | Welcome to our newest member, adams01 | |  | 
12-04-2006, 08:32 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,777
| | | Another spider ID please. | 
12-04-2006, 09:30 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Exmouth Devon
Posts: 3,019
| | | Re: Another spider ID please. They both look like the Long-jawed orb weaver but only 99.9999999999999999999% sure http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:T...id_closeup.jpg
Have a look at the URL You'rs also look s like the one in my book too | 
12-04-2006, 10:53 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,777
| | | Re: Another spider ID please. Thanks Beryl looks about right to me. Well done! | 
13-04-2006, 10:09 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 923
| | | Re: Another spider ID please. I'd agree with T. montana much more clear cut identification than the Philodromus sp. that you've posted. Great photos by the way. | 
13-04-2006, 10:14 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 14,777
| | | Re: Another spider ID please. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Imaginos I'd agree with T. montana much more clear cut identification than the Philodromus sp. that you've posted. Great photos by the way. | Thanks Imaginos. I'm useless with these creatures, but I find them fascinating, so be prepared for many more... | 
13-04-2006, 10:40 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 923
| | | Re: Another spider ID please. For identification purposes make sure you get a top down shot with a sense of scale (much like your fingertip shot on the other thread) these don't have to go in the Gallery-you can go for more aesthetically pleasing angles for there-but can be posted in the forum for people to look at. Spiders are a very difficult group with a lot of identification coming down to close examination of the sexual parts (the epigyne in the female, which is at the base of the underside of the abdomen (nearest the thorax) and the palps of the male) and I'm not sure whether many macro lenses can get useful shots of these in a natural situation. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 11 members and 189 guests | | bobbarber, JB9302, Jonners, Lemars, nettle, PMG, Puntalara, rmc, rogpow, teenielux, welsh.lensman | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | Snow Flea Today 12:46 AM 11 Replies, 238 Views | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |