| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,170
Threads: 82,383
Posts: 853,520
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, RMTREDSTON | | 
05-01-2011, 09:19 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Watford, Hertfordshire.
Posts: 4,867
| | | Re: camera body decision? Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcn I have the 1DmkIII and have to say it the dogz danglies for wildlife, even at only 10,5Megs it is worth its weight in gold. | More like the dog's haemorrhoids if you want to carry it far with a bunch of lenses - and more like carrying a bar of gold!
;^)
Sub 35mm cameras are a godsend for wildlife where you often need to travel quite a distance on foot.
Jim | 
05-01-2011, 02:03 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Swansea, South Wales
Posts: 391
| | | Re: camera body decision? You could use the camera and lenses as Dumbells. You won't need to go to the gym then.
Wish I could afford them. Still, I'm happy with my 7D, just need a good long lens is all.
Happy New Year All. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 0 members and 172 guests | | No Members online | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |