| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,170
Threads: 82,383
Posts: 853,520
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, RMTREDSTON | |  | | 
14-10-2010, 07:10 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,505
| | | Re: New Canon SX30 Superzoom Canny, I've not checked out whether it takes a teleconverter but will post some pix later where I compare shots from the FZ-45 with similar shots from the 40D. | 
14-10-2010, 10:08 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,505
| | | Re: New Canon SX30 Superzoom For those interested I've posted a brief blog about the FZ-45.
My general impression is that the default in-camera processing is pretty harsh and I will be playing around with the settings to try to reduce the amount of in-camera processing it does. The jpg output is fine for small prints and web postings, but pretty dire if you want to crop an image. The raw output is quite a bit cleaner, but as with all things you get pretty much what you pay for. The camera is nice to use, but if you've been spoiled by the quality of a dslr then I don't think you can ever really go back. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 0 members and 177 guests | | No Members online | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |