| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,175
Threads: 82,392
Posts: 853,574
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, JTM | |  | | 
30-12-2009, 09:41 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Southampton
Posts: 2,390
| | | Re: U.V filter advice,please. Cheers UKW.It all seems one way here, regards to generally not using a U.V or clear filter.
I got my lens last night,it has got a substantial hood with it.My friend is having second thoughts about using a U.V filter as standard practice.
Thanks all for your help.And hope you have a Happy New year.  Jason. | 
30-12-2009, 10:45 AM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Dorset
Posts: 314
| | | Re: U.V filter advice,please. Jason,
You can also rest in the knowledge that the professional super-telephotos - 300mm and up - don't have screw threads at the business end of the lens barrel, so even if you could find a filter large enough you wouldn't be able to attach it!
RichBrew
__________________ Cerca Trova | 
30-12-2009, 11:02 AM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 90
| | | Re: U.V filter advice,please. I agree with all the above. I once saw the advice that you should use a glass filter to protect the lens if you wear glass socks to protect your feet
(I am another 100-400L user and I don't use a UV/clear filter) | 
30-12-2009, 05:27 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: S. Devon
Posts: 3,900
| | | Re: U.V filter advice,please. Well I prefer to be more of a 'belt and braces man'. Like Rich Brew said, salt spray is a serious problem. And I take my lens hood off when using flash.
When scrabbling about in the undergrowth I frequently get my lens rubbed by twigs and brambles, and mud etc. All of my filters have some sort scratching.
I know that adding extra glass will cause some form of image degradation but it isn't noticeable for the vast majority of photos and is less of a problem than a scratched lens.
I would prefer not to attempt an insurance claim on my household insurance for camera equipment. Even if they did pay up, I would expect to lose my no claims discount.
So I will continue to use some sort of filter. I always used to carry a polarizing filter but haven't used one for a long time. They really do cause image quality problems and a loss of light which means a higher ISO. Correct exposure is the best way of getting enhanced results. | 
09-01-2010, 09:24 AM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
| | | Re: U.V filter advice,please. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 16 members and 323 guests | | AfternoonLemon, alandebenham, Arjaydee, Billy Butternut, Birdman1976, Closescapes, Dorts, gobbiner, Johnny Redgate, JTM, littlefire, NickCantle, nursiebernard, reefbirder, sebastianbawn, speyghillie | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 192 Views | | | | | |