| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,175
Threads: 82,392
Posts: 853,574
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, JTM | |  | | 
24-11-2009, 04:00 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,126
| | | Re: Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 MK 2 Macro Vs Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L Looking back over this thread, I've noticed that I wrote, Nikon, Canon and Samsung  I meant to say Sigma - sorry. I'm surprised that nobody picked that one up lol | 
24-11-2009, 05:17 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cheshire
Posts: 32
| | | Re: Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 MK 2 Macro Vs Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L Hi Wizzo,
Been a mad day sorry for not responding sooner!!
The site link looks great, thanks for that.Nice to see my camera getting a good review!!.
I have to say I am very concerned at the Sigma comments I am hearing and I am in a dilema as to which way to go. i am tempted to hold out for a few weeks and see if I can spot a second hand Canon going for a reasonable price, in which case I would snap it up.
I will keep you posted and look forward to hearing how you are getting on.
take care
Andy | 
29-11-2009, 01:07 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: knowle, solihull (just south of b'ham)
Posts: 2,830
| | | Re: Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 MK 2 Macro Vs Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L i'm certainly no expert in buying choices like this, but would you feel more secure in your choice if you went and asked to try the lenses before deciding? | 
29-11-2009, 03:38 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cheshire
Posts: 32
| | | Re: Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 MK 2 Macro Vs Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L Hi,
Thanks for your advice Squichy, i have done exactly that and I have decided to go for the Sigma and I have just bought one of Ebay for a bargain price so hopefully in a couple of days I will be snapping away with my new lens!!.
Whilst I know the Canon lens is the ultimate i just cannot justify the extra money and so for now I will be happy using a Sigma until such time I feel it is necessary to upgrade,if ever?
Thanks for all your help as ever, you have all been great.
Take care
Andy | 
30-11-2009, 10:13 AM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 80
| | | Re: Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 MK 2 Macro Vs Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L Interesting to read the debate above; has anyone got any opinions of the Tamron 70-200mm f2.8 lens? There's a couple available for £499 at my local independant camera shop and I wasn't sure of their reputation? | 
30-11-2009, 12:52 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: knowle, solihull (just south of b'ham)
Posts: 2,830
| | | Re: Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 MK 2 Macro Vs Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L Quote:
Originally Posted by Otter Spotter Hi,
Thanks for your advice Squichy, i have done exactly that and I have decided to go for the Sigma and I have just bought one of Ebay for a bargain price so hopefully in a couple of days I will be snapping away with my new lens!!.
Whilst I know the Canon lens is the ultimate i just cannot justify the extra money and so for now I will be happy using a Sigma until such time I feel it is necessary to upgrade,if ever?
Thanks for all your help as ever, you have all been great.
Take care
Andy | Very glad you're satisfied with your choice! | 
30-11-2009, 03:34 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,126
| | | Re: Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 MK 2 Macro Vs Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L Hiya Vaughnie! The Tamron that you mention was reviewed in one of the camera magazines a while back. I think I may still have it. If you wanted to send me your address in a PM or via email, I'll gladly forward it to you. Quite understand if you'd rather not of course. As far as the review went, it scored well and compared favorably against the Sigma. Interesting to note that Jessops are no longer stocking Sigma lenses, prefering to go for what they describe as, the better quality Tamron range. I have handled this lens and there's no doubting it's aimed at the Pro/enthusiast market and is obviously well built. Personally, I'm not convinced that it's as well made as the Sigma equivalent, however. The Sigma looks and feels better to me. Tamron do make some remarkable lenses though, as any owner of the Tamron 90mm macro will confirm. I do know that Sigma's 70-200mm f2.8 scored very highly on these reviews - that's if you have any faith in magazine reviews, but that's a different thread I guess - Wizzo |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 18 members and 329 guests | | AfternoonLemon, Arjaydee, Billy Butternut, Birdman1976, Closescapes, Dorts, Durrell, gobbiner, Johnny Redgate, johnnyfive, JTM, littlefire, NickCantle, nursiebernard, reefbirder, scamps180, sebastianbawn, speyghillie | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 192 Views | | | | | |