| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
| 7 | |
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
| | 15 |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
| |
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
| |
29
|
30
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  » Stats |
Members: 32,221
Threads: 48,341
Posts: 524,030
Top Poster: glsammy (13,193)
| | Welcome to our newest member, Spots | | |
Welcome to the Wild About Britain forums | | | | 
26-10-2009, 09:45 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Bristol
Posts: 146
| | | Sigma 50-500mm v Sigma 150-500mm
I'm considering buying a long zoom and have looked at both the 50-500 and 150-500 Sigma's. I've noticed that the old 'Bigma' is classed as an EX lens, which I understand is short for excellent? The newer 150-500mm is missing this lettering, however. Now the obvious thing would be, to pop into Jessop's or Jacob's - or so you would have thought? I'd have been better off asking in B&Q! Do any of you guys have any idea if the newer lens is of a lesser quality? Also, I'm torn between one of these Sigma lenses and Nikon's own 70-200 f2.8 with a converter. Basically, I want some one to make the decision for me  |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Threaded Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
| | | 33 members and 192 guests | | Beekeeper, BillyPilgrim, Bruce Williams, Bwrack, cat72uk, clackdish, coopder, cutecoot, david156, davidbr, earthdragon64, fairplay, Fizzog, Jason Green, jaybie, Jim Ford, Jonners, Kayleigh, loripo, Meta menardi, mickmassie, NickCantle, philipc, PMG, Rich_, RobSutton, shiffty, stigofthedump, SusieBee, tcvarlh, Ukwildlifeo, valleyforge, wildliferescuer | » New Wildlife Posts |   Old... Today 09:00 PM 35 Replies, 223 Views | Deer Today 08:59 PM 0 Replies, 1 Views | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | adverts` Today 08:52 PM 5 Replies, 27 Views | | | | | | | |
