| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
| 7 | |
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
| | 15 |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
| |
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
| |
29
|
30
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  » Stats |
Members: 32,248
Threads: 48,388
Posts: 524,596
Top Poster: glsammy (13,193)
| | Welcome to our newest member, Oswyntail | | |
Welcome to the Wild About Britain forums | | | | 
15-08-2009, 12:25 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 135
| | | Which Canon for better quality at high iso ?
Hello all,I am using a Canon 400D,and find I am regularly having to bump up the iso to achieve blur free images.I am not actually unhappy with the results my 400D produces,but I do wonder which body would I upgrade too for under a £1000 to improve image quality at high iso settings ? The 50D and 500D from what I have read,are not exactly a leap forward regarding better quality at high iso,I don`t see that the 40D will do much better than my 400D,so sticking with canon what do you suggest ? I don`t really want second hand,and I have my 400mm prime which I adore,so swapping systems is not really an option  Any suggestions,is a new SLR from Canon due ? |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Threaded Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
| | | 23 members and 162 guests | | al woodcock, Alantb, Beamish, Boddie, bonitin, Bumblebeebob, ChrisR, cutecoot, cybershot, fairplay, martinrobinson, ohgreatstew, Oswyntail, PMG, posie, RED, RobSutton, rogpow, shirl, Sienna, skywatcher, TeresaW, wizzo | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |
