| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,172
Threads: 82,383
Posts: 853,529
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, lemajanyvb | |  | | 
17-05-2009, 07:26 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: potters bar ,herts
Posts: 130
| | | Re: sigma 150-500 or 50-500 i have a new bigma for sale , but i dont know if i,m allowed to offer things for sale on this site..i bought it just after christmas but find it a bit too heavy for me. it would be fine for a man.. | 
25-05-2009, 07:43 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Glastonbury, Somerset
Posts: 214
| | | Re: sigma 150-500 or 50-500 Well after reading the replies and seeing some of the images taken when members have been using the sigma 150-500, I decided to go for the 150-500 over the 50-500 as I do a lot of walking so having OS on the lens is very handy,
the lens arrived Friday  which was great as this meant that I could take it on the Avalon 24 event over the weekend, I'm now kicking my self and wishing I had taken my cheap tamron 70-300 zoom as it takes a much better picture and I would of got some good photos that I fill would have been good enough to go in the Gallery,
But after doing 24 Hours of walks and carrying the 150-500 during most of the daylight walks, I did not get one good quality photo  the OS seemed to work when hand-held but autofocus is way out even having the lens on a tripod and OS turned off , the lens could not get any photos in focus, but then even focusing manually I could not get one sharp photo there all way to soft and just not good quality even in very good light and fast shutter speeds this len just did not produce the quality if should of done  I think I got one that should not of passed the QC  so I'm going to send it back and get the 50-500
__________________ Thanks
Keith ;O) | 
27-05-2009, 11:29 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Glastonbury, Somerset
Posts: 214
| | | Re: sigma 150-500 or 50-500
__________________ Thanks
Keith ;O)
Last edited by kiff; 27-05-2009 at 11:33 AM.
| 
27-05-2009, 07:28 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: S. Devon
Posts: 3,900
| | | Re: sigma 150-500 or 50-500 I know that Sigma had some quality problems with some of the first lenses of this model but that would appear to be largely corrected now. But it could be that some of these lenses are still lurking on sales counters and will pop up from time to time.
For hand held work, especially, I think you will be pleased with this lens. |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |