| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,170
Threads: 82,383
Posts: 853,520
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, RMTREDSTON | |  | | 
09-01-2007, 09:02 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Gloucester
Posts: 1,375
| | | Re: Composition and Form Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Matt
I initially opened them in Rawshooter, applied the wizard to auto fix the exposure (it isn't always correct but usually it is not far out). I then processed them and opened them in Photoshop. I checked the levels - using Kev's method is good, but it is exactly the reverse of the normal way, i.e. you detect the low exposure first as opposed to the high - but for me I don't see any particular advantage one way or t'other as the straight forward way clearly illustrates over exposure as opposed to under exposure the points in question are shown as red - over and blue - under. On reflection I think Kev's way is logically more sensitive. After this I checked the shadow/highlight tool - what a revelation! I hadn't used it before but wow it really shows detail that was not hitherto visible, - once again thanks to Graham.
Jon | looks like I slightly confused people, It doesn't matter which end of the exposure you adjust first, it was just the way I typed it in. Normally I get the highlights sorted first as well |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 0 members and 185 guests | | No Members online | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |