| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|  » Stats |
Members: 50,170
Threads: 82,383
Posts: 853,520
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069)
| | Welcome to our newest member, RMTREDSTON | |  | | 
12-12-2008, 03:20 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Scunthorpe, Nth Lincs
Posts: 2,687
| | | Re: Nuthatch with or without
You know it makes sense.  Ohh Yeesss |
12-12-2008, 03:27 PM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Small North Lincolnshire village
Posts: 9,662
| | | Re: Nuthatch with or without
|
22-11-2010, 06:52 PM
|  | New Member | | Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11
| |  Re: Nuthatch with or without
I would be happy to have taken the first one,I've never seen the Nuthatch's whereI live still enough to photograph. They pay a quick visit to the nuts and away. |
25-11-2010, 06:22 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,546
| | | Re: Nuthatch with or without
More often than not its better to have pictures uncluttered I think. The one with out the branch is better as it keeps your eye on the bird and nothing distracts you from it. Fantastic picture of a fab bird. Took me a while to get a good one despite getting plenty of chances   |
25-11-2010, 03:30 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: South Coast, UK, nr Dorchester
Posts: 717
| | | Re: Nuthatch with or without
I think "with".
I think it frames the bird nicely and it's also an honest image.
I know some people who wouldnt agree its right to take a stray coke can or tesco's bag out of a picture. The question is where do you stop? Powerlines, television aerials?
Whichever you prefer, and are comfortable with.
__________________
Go with the flow or say what you think? |
07-12-2010, 11:32 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: North Devon
Posts: 113
| | | Re: Nuthatch with or without
Lovely capture.
For me I prefer the one without the stick, with it there I cant help but flick my eyes between the two.
Stephen |
08-12-2010, 02:35 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Blairgowrie ,,Perthshire.
Posts: 83
| | | Re: Nuthatch with or without
For those of us who don't have the Nuthatch in our area ,could you please post a picture of the stick 
On a serious note, I go for the one without the stick. Thank you for sharing. |
08-12-2010, 02:46 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: n.e.somerset
Posts: 3,222
| | | Re: Nuthatch with or without
Trees have branches so stick to the one with it.....
__________________
Once, I used to Ramble!
But now I just Amble. |
18-12-2010, 12:36 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Bolton
Posts: 151
| | | Re: Nuthatch with or without
the one without the stick ( less distraction )
i do thing you've overcooked the sharpening a tad though but thats a personal opinion i sometimes like to see a slightly softer texture to try to stop the feathers looking spikey if you understand what i mean | | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
| » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | |  Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |
