| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,170
Threads: 82,383
Posts: 853,520
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, RMTREDSTON | |  | | 
26-10-2007, 12:15 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: SE Northumberland
Posts: 2,120
| | | Re: camera advice Indeed.If it had been an 18x version of the fz30/50 lens (35-630mm equivalent)then that WOULD have been something special
Mark H | 
27-10-2007, 11:09 AM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
| | | Re: camera advice just a couple more questions  what sort of iso level would i have to use on overcast days or in woodland? id like to send some photos to an agency (if i can get some decent ones) to try to offset the cost of the camera a bit but they have said that they reject images for noise. would it be possible to get acceptable quality shots in less than perfect conditions? | 
27-10-2007, 12:48 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 4,586
| | | Re: camera advice Quote:
Originally Posted by arran256 just a couple more questions  what sort of iso level would i have to use on overcast days or in woodland? id like to send some photos to an agency (if i can get some decent ones) to try to offset the cost of the camera a bit but they have said that they reject images for noise. would it be possible to get acceptable quality shots in less than perfect conditions? | if you're taking images of a still subject then you can use a tripod and use a low ISO. You only need to raise the ISO if movement becomes a factor - movement of the subject or movement of the camera. The image stabilisation will help with the latter. The camera is capable of taking very good quality images, but be warned that the majority of picture agencies are extraordinarily fussy.
Matt | 
27-10-2007, 02:15 PM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 262
| | | Re: camera advice Photo agencies, as matt-xyz points out, are a particular bunch. The minimum file size for editorial work on some publications is around the 25 mega pixel mark, while some agencies provide a list of approved cameras for unsolicited work. You also need to be prolific, as some require submissions of around 200 images a month to keep you on its books. It's also an advantage if you are shooting material that is a touch out of the ordinary.
Big stock agencies like Getty Images and Corbis are something of a tall order to be accepted, while some of the smaller ones are not worth the time and effort. Initially, be prepared to get a significant amount of rejections, but if you can supply sell-able images of good quality you stand a chance.
Good luck!
HW |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |