| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,169
Threads: 82,383
Posts: 853,519
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, worrit | | 
08-02-2011, 06:31 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2010 Location: Snowdonia, N. Wales
Posts: 3,919
| | | Re: Woodland plants for identification Quote:
Originally Posted by stigofthedump You could be correct Dorts, my eyesight is not the best. Just going on the sporophytes, to the very left of the photo there looks to be a beak to one of the capsules. That with the general jizz of it is what I based my judgement on.
Vince | I suppose this plant could be rather wet if the photo is recent which could make it look untypical. I can also, having enlarged the pic, just make-out the beak you spotted, (I'm sure your eyesight is better than mine!), which would rule out my Mnium, so let's try your Rhynchostegium confertum.
(Isn't it good to have a few plants to look at after a long dark winter?)
Dorts. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |