| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,169
Threads: 82,383
Posts: 853,519
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, worrit | |  | 
02-01-2012, 11:11 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Diderma? Can anyone give me even a family for this group growing on a birch leaf
Thanks
Mal | 
03-01-2012, 12:46 AM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: West Sussex
Posts: 396
| | | Re: Diderma? Hi Mal
I usually find these are either Diderma effusum or Didymium difforme, the latter being by far more common IMO.
The easiest way of seperating them is by spore size (they do have other seperating characters such as the nature of the peridium etc):
7-9 µm - Diderma effusum
11-14 µm - Didymium difforme
I'm not sure if they can be seperated reliably in the field - I have certainly not found any surefire method. It would be interesting to hear from others with experience of both species.
Cheers,
Nick
__________________ "Experience is the safest guide, and until we aquire that we shall occasionally fail" - M.C.Cooke | 
03-01-2012, 08:45 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Diderma? Thanks Nick
Very mixed sized spores but plenty in the 12um region so rule out D effusum and to go with D difforme.
Mal | 
03-01-2012, 05:33 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 70
| | | Re: Diderma? Hello Mal,
I agree with Nick that this is Didymium difforme on the basis of your spore measurements.
With regard to seperating this from Diderma effusum in the field, I have found that Diderma effusum tends to form more extensive plasmodicarps (based on 4 finds of Didymium difforme and 19 of Diderma effusum). Though this is by no means foolproof and checking spore size is a reliable way of seperating the two.
I have found Diderma effusum to be more common than Didymium difforme.
This is probaly due to locality and habitat as all my studies are conducted in a single (though varied and extensive) wood on the outskirts of Swansea.
Regards,
Kevin |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 01:53 PM 8 Replies, 189 Views | | | | | |