| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,157
Threads: 82,349
Posts: 853,288
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Ye Olde Justin | |  | | 
12-11-2007, 10:10 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 10,729
| | | Unknown prints Two prints that i carnt seem to put a name to.
First found in woodland on a track. Stoat? Squirrel? Polecat, something else?
It was about the size of a 50 pence coin.
Sorry it is quite hard to make out.
Found on the edge of woodland. Very large about 11cm from tip to dew claw. just a roe deer or something else
Cheers
Last edited by Dogghound; 12-11-2007 at 10:38 AM.
| 
12-11-2007, 03:39 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: SE Northumberland
Posts: 2,120
| | | Re: Unknown prints Hi mate, first one looks very much like a Stoat right fore print.Second one Roe Deer, probably moving at speed for the dew claws to show.
Mark H | 
13-11-2007, 08:46 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 10,729
| | | Re: Unknown prints Quote:
Originally Posted by mh68 Hi mate, first one looks very much like a Stoat right fore print.Second one Roe Deer, probably moving at speed for the dew claws to show.
Mark H | Cheer's mate. They were my main thought's but best to get a second opinion. Would make sense as both species are very abundant in the area. | 
13-11-2007, 08:55 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: SE Northumberland
Posts: 2,120
| | | Re: Unknown prints No probs.The stoat print is a nice find, being a lightweight animal its hard to find good prints like the one you pictured
Mark H | 
13-11-2007, 09:09 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 10,729
| | | Re: Unknown prints Quote:
Originally Posted by mh68 No probs.The stoat print is a nice find, being a lightweight animal its hard to find good prints like the one you pictured
Mark H | Yes it was in very soft mud, on a track between woodland and farmland, its an area ive seen both stoats and a polecat. As well as plenty of squirrels, the general size seemed about rite for stoat though. | 
13-11-2007, 09:15 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: SE Northumberland
Posts: 2,120
| | | Re: Unknown prints Interdigital pad looked too round for Polecat to my eyes compared to the references I have.The size,shape and position in relation to the digital pads is what distinguished it as a forefoot print too 
Dry as a bone up here at present, so prints of any description are hard to find.
Mark H | 
13-11-2007, 09:42 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 10,729
| | | Re: Unknown prints Quote:
Originally Posted by mh68 Interdigital pad looked too round for Polecat to my eyes compared to the references I have.The size,shape and position in relation to the digital pads is what distinguished it as a forefoot print too 
Dry as a bone up here at present, so prints of any description are hard to find.
Mark H |
Cheer's for that info mark, my experience of prints is some what limited compared to the mammals themselves. Got some photo's of some great badger prints too but they are quite distinguishable, so how do you tell between a fox and a dog mate? cheers. | 
13-11-2007, 09:46 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: SE Northumberland
Posts: 2,120
| | | Re: Unknown prints In a Fox print you can draw an imaginary "X" crossing between the interdigital pad and the digital pads without it "touching" the prints themselves, with Dog prints an "X" pictured in this way will cut through one or more of the pad prints.
Hope that makes sense.
Mark H | 
13-11-2007, 09:49 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 10,729
| | | Re: Unknown prints Quote:
Originally Posted by mh68 In a Fox print you can draw an imaginary "X" crossing between the interdigital pad and the digital pads without it "touching" the prints themselves, with Dog prints an "X" pictured in this way will cut through one or more of the pad prints.
Hope that makes sense.
Mark H | Yes i no what you mean, quite a easy way of telling the difference, i will keep that in mind next time im out. Cheer's. | 
13-11-2007, 09:55 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: SE Northumberland
Posts: 2,120
| | | Re: Unknown prints Glad you understood what i meant, just tried to do a diagram in Paint to explain,and it was terrible 
Another clue is the gap between the 2 front claw marks if present...in Fox the claws are very close together, in Dog theres more distance between them in most cases.The X method is the most reliable though.
Mark H |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! 30-05-2012 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 123 Views | | | | | |