| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
| |
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
| |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
| |
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
| |
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
| 1 | 2 | 3 | » Stats |
Members: 48,648
Threads: 78,876
Posts: 821,258
Top Poster: glsammy (14,777) | | Welcome to our newest member, Kellyn | |  | 
26-01-2009, 07:59 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SW Ireland
Posts: 1,616
| | | Possible Roccella? I came across this one on a coastal rock today and wondered if it could be Roccella phycopsis?
Confirmation or correction would be very appreciated - there don't seem many Irish records in Dobson and LichenIreland hasn't a distribution map for it so I'm wondering if its just a battered-looking something-else.... | 
29-01-2009, 01:24 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SW Ireland
Posts: 1,616
| | | Re: Possible Roccella? I've just got Frank Dobson's 'Lichen-Identifier' CD (multi-access key) and from that Ramalina chondrina looks to be a maybe-possibility ......? | 
29-01-2009, 02:01 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,165
| | | Re: Possible Roccella? I'd never heard of Roccella before your post: so I'm afraid you're out on your own on this one! | 
12-03-2009, 04:13 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Renfrewshire, W. Scotland
Posts: 693
| | | Re: Possible Roccella? Hi Jenny,
I have never seen either Roccella (hoping to rectify that quite soon) but my understanding of R. phycopsis is that the branches are pretty solid in cross-section, with maybe just a narrow diameter cental hole, whereas your photograph shows something with very hollow branches. The 'ulcerated' look of the surface some of the branches is very Ramalina-like.
One rare possibility, not out of the question in your area, is Ramalina portuensis, which apparently has branches tending to be round in cross-section rather than flattened (never seen it either). I don't believe it is R. chondrina - too coarse and branching looks wrong.
However, can we completely rule out the multi-variable, ever-annoying mistress* of disguise that is R. siliquosa? A check in 'Purvis' confirms that it has forms with branches that are more or less rounded. One or two of the branches in your photograph are flattened and rather curved, like a scythe, which I find a useful character for spotting R. siliquosa amongst R. cuspidata.
*The Latin name is female gender.
I don't know, but I think R. siliquosa is a possibility, allbeit very different from how it usually looks.
But don't give up on looking for Roccella species though - they must be possible in your area.
Alan | 
12-03-2009, 12:54 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SW Ireland
Posts: 1,616
| | | Re: Possible Roccella?  Thank you Alan - yes, after going back to that one it does seem to check out as a very snail-munched and battered R. siliquosa, but I'll keep hoping to come across Roccella at some point! |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 13 members and 283 guests | | Billabong Karen, eeyore, Gemgem, hedgesparrow, hels, Kellyn, MP, nursiebernard, Pete Collins, scamps180, suffolk, Tringa, waxcap | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |