| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,155
Threads: 82,345
Posts: 853,231
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Bluepjs | |  | 
12-07-2011, 12:11 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Lincoln
Posts: 29
| | | Rather large Bee Whilst visting Monks Wood and the adjacent Watts Wood last sunday (just outside Lincoln) I saw a rather large bee feeding on Knapweed. It was 'fluffy' like a bumble bee but not round. Instead it was long and very heavy looking. As far as I could tell, it was black all over apart from what appreared to be a pale orange/red tip to the rump. Overall length looked in excess of 1 inch. I couldn't get a closer look as not only was there Knapweed but quite a lot of nettles and I wasn't dressed appropriately for a 'bondu bash'.
Could anyone shed light on this species from my somewhat sketchy description?
Thanks in advance | 
12-07-2011, 12:54 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,193
| | | Re: Rather large Bee Possibly a queen Bombus lapidarius. | 
12-07-2011, 01:20 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Hayes, Middlesex
Posts: 3,712
| | | Re: Rather large Bee As Matt says sounds like B lapidarius aka Red-tailed Bumblebee
Nige | 
12-07-2011, 04:31 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Lincoln
Posts: 29
| | | Re: Rather large Bee Thanks for the info. I have seen red-tailed bumble bees before and this didn't appear to be one of these unless it was the angle at which I was viewing it. It appeared much more elongated than a bumble bee, and the coloured area on the rump appeared to be just the tip. I wish had been able to get closer to get a photograph. | 
12-07-2011, 04:34 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Lincoln
Posts: 29
| | | Re: Rather large Bee Could it have been Bombus ruderatus? | 
13-07-2011, 06:08 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Salisbury; Wilts
Posts: 2,308
| | | Re: Rather large Bee Not if the colour scheme is as described | 
13-07-2011, 11:44 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Lincoln
Posts: 4,826
| | | Re: Rather large Bee Quote:
Originally Posted by cendoubleu Could it have been Bombus ruderatus? | Perhaps you meant Bombus ruderarius? You would need to see that the female has red pollen hairs on the corbiculum. You might find this chart useful.. Bumblebees - KeyToNature
__________________ http://cubits.org/buglife/ |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 27 members and 416 guests | | alandy, Astra, Bluepjs, britnik, Dorts, earthdragon64, Gill Catton, glsammy, Jason Green, Jersali, LJB, Lone_Ranger, marvin, Meta menardi, MJM, Naturenutz, oxycera, RichardB, RoyW, spaldingd, squishy, The Magpie, Tormentil, waxcap, Xalrahc, Za | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 115 Views | | | | | |