| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
2
| |
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
| |
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
| |
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
| |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
| » Stats |
Members: 50,157
Threads: 82,349
Posts: 853,287
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Ye Olde Justin | |  | | 
28-05-2011, 10:01 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Crouch End, North London
Posts: 83
| | | 3 Hoverflies for ID please  
Please would someone ID these hoverflies for me.
Thanks,
Paul | 
28-05-2011, 10:30 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Hull
Posts: 783
| | | Re: 3 Hoverflies for ID please The first one is Episyrphus balteatus. The second one could be Eristalis. The last one could be Eupeodes corollae.
__________________ Natural History and Behaviour of Garden Invertebrates BugBlog | 
28-05-2011, 10:43 PM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: London
Posts: 11,831
| | | Re: 3 Hoverflies for ID please Evening Paul, Episyrphus balteatus, Eristalis sp., and E. luniger, I think.
Take care, Jason | 
28-05-2011, 11:13 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Lincoln
Posts: 4,826
| | | Re: 3 Hoverflies for ID please Agree with #1 Episyrphus balteatus female
#2 Eristalis tenax female
#3 Eupeodes corollae female, those spots really do look to reach the edge.
Janet
__________________ http://cubits.org/buglife/ | 
29-05-2011, 12:28 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: London
Posts: 11,831
| | | Re: 3 Hoverflies for ID please Note the greyish areas on the anterior and posterior margins of the abdominal segments. The most reliable marking is the left-hand one on T2. Those on T2 on the right and then T3 are either obscured by the wing or photographic glare. The frons is a good feature too - look at the longitudinal line almost reaching the antennal bases.
Certainly E. luniger | 
29-05-2011, 12:42 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Lincoln
Posts: 4,826
| | | Re: 3 Hoverflies for ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Green Note the greyish areas on the anterior and posterior margins of the abdominal segments. The most reliable marking is the left-hand one on T2. Those on T2 on the right and then T3 are either obscured by the wing or photographic glare. The frons is a good feature too - look at the longitudinal line almost reaching the antennal bases.
Certainly E. luniger  | Think again Jason, note the spots on the right side reaching and bleeding into the margin of the abdomen.  Photographic effects have distorted the other side, besides you can't see the margin.
__________________ http://cubits.org/buglife/ | 
29-05-2011, 07:50 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: London
Posts: 11,831
| | | Re: 3 Hoverflies for ID please The only reliable section worth examining here is the left side of T2. The photographic effects at play here are affecting the right-hand side, such as the wing covering the margin on T2 and glare covering it on T3. The left-hand side is unobstructed and the clear black line (the margin, usefully) is not intercepted by 'bleeding'.
Elsewhere the abdomen generally appears flattened away from the anterior/posterior margins. You can also see the greyish bands on the rear margins too. E. corollae also has a rounder habitus than luniger - this looks quite slim, esp. for a female insect.
Next, look at the vertex. There is clearly a longitudinal extension to the black you find around the ocelli. This isn't apparent in corollae.
Last edited by Jason Green; 29-05-2011 at 07:53 AM.
| 
29-05-2011, 08:15 AM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Crouch End, North London
Posts: 83
| | | Re: 3 Hoverflies for ID please Thanks for these ids people. Fascinating debate. Here're two more shots of the same individual. Hopefully they will help resolve the issue. I've got some more of what I think is the same species but were taken 20 minutes later so I can't be sure it's the same individual.
Take care,
Paul  | 
29-05-2011, 08:36 AM
|  | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: London
Posts: 11,831
| | | Re: 3 Hoverflies for ID please Yes, the first is definately luniger. Not sure the second is further identifiable, but a great Eupeodes flight shot, none-the-less!
I think the second one is also luniger, from the apparent dark hairs near the vertex.
Last edited by Jason Green; 29-05-2011 at 08:41 AM.
| 
29-05-2011, 08:45 AM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Crouch End, North London
Posts: 83
| | | Re: 3 Hoverflies for ID please Hi Jason - it's definately the same individual - I've got about 15 shots taken at 14:03 on the 18th May 2011, of which all three of these are examples. The beast starts off on the leaf and takes off and then extends its legs in-flight.
Best wishes,
Paul |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! 30-05-2012 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 123 Views | | | | | |