| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,149
Threads: 82,326
Posts: 853,136
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, TransAmDan | |  | 
30-03-2011, 06:49 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 986
| | | Hoverfly ID ID possible on this hoverfly, taken yesterday on a very dull day? Guessing totally it might be Platycheirus sp.
Thanks
Brian v.
__________________ Brian V. | 
30-03-2011, 03:11 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: S. Devon
Posts: 3,893
| | | Re: Hoverfly ID That is a tricky one, Brian.
In some ways it does resemble Platycheirus albimanus where the spots can appear bronze coloured under some light conditions.
But, unless it is also a trick of the light, the scuttelum seems too yellowish. A clear view of the front tarsus would settle this issue.
However, going by how those abdomen spots slope forward, I would seriously consider a dark form of Meliscaeva auricolis which can be extremely variable in colouration at this time of the year.
Some more camera angles are needed I suspect. | 
31-03-2011, 06:50 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 986
| | | Re: Hoverfly ID Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff F That is a tricky one, Brian.
In some ways it does resemble Platycheirus albimanus where the spots can appear bronze coloured under some light conditions.
But, unless it is also a trick of the light, the scuttelum seems too yellowish. A clear view of the front tarsus would settle this issue.
However, going by how those abdomen spots slope forward, I would seriously consider a dark form of Meliscaeva auricolis which can be extremely variable in colouration at this time of the year.
Some more camera angles are needed I suspect. | Thanks Geoff for the info and poss ID. Only managed one shot of this- no way it would allow me an overhead shot, I would have been shading it too much.
Brian v.
__________________ Brian V. | 
08-04-2011, 08:36 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Stamford, Lincolnshire
Posts: 181
| | | Re: Hoverfly ID Hi Brian
I am pretty sure this is Meliscaeva auricollis. My thinking is:
Face - looks yellow - although this may be lighting and dusting.
Scutellum - yellow - no Platycheirus that I know have this
Front legs - not expanded
Markings on tergites - orange yellow and look to have shape of a dark M. auricollis.
Body shape - this is jizz but it tells me something.
Regards
Roger |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 24 members and 348 guests | | Adrian Vygus, afcsupporter, artdemole, briar rose, chrisjohnson, davedotcom, fog, Gordon Jarvis, GuyF, Insomniak, Johnny81, kathyheel, Malthusius, mollisia, pywacket4u, Russell Bean, Sakke, scott665, Sofija, speyghillie, TERNAROUND, topmum, TransAmDan, Xav | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 108 Views | | | | | |