| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,144
Threads: 82,318
Posts: 853,068
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, docotton | | 
20-06-2008, 03:14 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 175
| | | Hoverfly ID please This was taken in Cambridge Botanical gardens on 16/6/08. 
It looks rather like Eupeodes luniger (again) but I was wondering if it was something different this time as the markings look a bit different and there's a dark mark on the tip of the head that's not there on other pictures I've got of that species. I also noticed that the abdomen seemed particularly thin and wide, don't know if that's significant.
Thanks
Will | 
21-06-2008, 07:52 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Barnsley
Posts: 1,722
| | | Re: Hoverfly ID please Stubbs refers to a 'species C', close to luniger, that has a broadly bilobed black area on the frons a bit like the one in your photo. Just a thought. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 17 members and 293 guests | | davedotcom, dunkeld, earthdragon64, frits_b, GTH, GuyF, janeandphil50, Jax2000, Johnny81, nikolai_avenger, Pigeon feather, Posbyonechop, shenk1, Sofija, thewoose, Tormentil, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 101 Views | | | | | |