| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,144
Threads: 82,318
Posts: 853,068
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, docotton | |  | 
10-05-2008, 04:53 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 58
| | | Centipede and Bee ID Hello. Im new here as you can probably tell from my abysmal camera skills, just wanted to see if you could ID these. | 
10-05-2008, 05:01 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: SE Kent
Posts: 1,396
| | Re: Centipede and Bee ID Hi RGregory,
A warm welcome to WAB, the pic of your Centipede isn't exactly great,
But don't stop trying , sorry I can't help with the ID but someone will be able to help. Keep posting,
Duncan | 
10-05-2008, 05:06 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 58
| | | Re: Centipede and Bee ID I think its my Camera actually, takes good enough landscape photos, but no good with little creepy crawlies, just keeps blurring out when zooming in. But what can I say...
Last edited by Rgregory; 10-05-2008 at 05:09 PM.
| 
10-05-2008, 06:08 PM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 662
| | | Re: Centipede and Bee ID Hi Rgregory, and welcome from me too
The Centipede is of genus Lithobius, but you probably knew that already. Some 20+ species in Britain, and most are hard to ID from photo even for experts (which I'm not) ... counting little thorns on the last tail-like hind legs etc. If someone shows up who's more into it, I'm pretty sure (s)he would also appreciate a size estimate.
What camera do you own? Mine is pretty much "toy quality" but with the right settings it doesn't do too bad for *cough* "macros" *cough* - so maybe we can help with suggestions for the settings?
Cheers, Arp | 
10-05-2008, 06:32 PM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 58
| | | Re: Centipede and Bee ID I have a Samsung Digimax 420, as i said before, its taken some excellent photos of scenery. But cant seem to get it right with insects.  And I think I have found the species from the Lithobius genus, Lithobius forficatus.
Last edited by Rgregory; 10-05-2008 at 06:35 PM.
| 
10-05-2008, 06:48 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: South Notts
Posts: 656
| | | Re: Centipede and Bee ID This is not really the right forum to discuss camera technique but I wonder if your Digimax has a macro mode (or even super-marcro)? That might enable it to focus close up.
Richard | 
11-05-2008, 12:06 AM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 662
| | | Re: Centipede and Bee ID Quote:
Originally Posted by Rgregory I have a Samsung Digimax 420 | It has a 6cm "macro" function, usually indicated in the menu/dial/whatever with a "tulip" symbol. Read the manual, figure out how to activate it and then don't come closer to the object at hand than 6cm (2 inches might still work too) and the cam should be able to focus okay. Quote: |
And I think I have found the species from the Lithobius genus, Lithobius forficatus.
| What makes you sure it's not one of the other 20+ quite similar looking species? What character do you go by? How big/long was your animal anyway? | 
11-05-2008, 07:11 AM
|  | Active Member | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 58
| | | Re: Centipede and Bee ID I think it was about 2cm. And yes, I used the macro with better results | 
11-05-2008, 01:27 PM
| | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 662
| | | Re: Centipede and Bee ID Hi Rgregory,
Happy to hear you've worked out the macro Quote:
Originally Posted by Rgregory I think it was about 2cm. | That would rule out many of the 20+ species, but still leaving some 5 or so options. I've steered clear of Lithobius up to now because I find them too irritatingly agile for photography  and often too hard to ID (needing details not usually visible on "normal" photos), so I can't confirm forficatus for you - mainly due to lack of experience with the other options.
So, yes, it could be forficatus (most characters I can verify from the image seem to fit) and it's even quite probable as it's a very common species. But I'm not about to tell you that it is - will need someone else with more experience with Lithobiomorpha for that - sorry.
Cheers anyway, and good luck and lots of fun with the macros!! 
Arp |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 21 members and 294 guests | | Bladderwort, davedotcom, Dillybythesea, dunkeld, frits_b, GTH, GuyF, janeandphil50, Jax2000, Johnny81, juanituk, Kenneth Baldwin, nikolai_avenger, Pepsis, Pigeon feather, Posbyonechop, scamps180, Super Josh, thewoose, Tormentil, ~T~ | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 101 Views | | | | | |