I always thought/hoped that there was some point in developing the fine art of ladybird pupae photo-identification but have had to prove many of my own "working thesis" wrong - mostly those based on colour patterns have proven useless.
So, I would have to agree with Paul mostly on 5=Syrphid and 7="interesting" - but the real ladybird pupae are tricky at best.
To kick it off, I have
not even begun serious analysis of all my own pupa-images yet, so this is all
very premature and should probably best be ignored completely(!):
First of all,
size-indications would/could have helped
somewhat.
Second, it is
much easier to say what it is
not 
Now that's quite cheap, but I would
tend to disagree with Paul on the
Cal.qua. for No.3, as I would expect the little "side wings" (have no idea what these should be called) to be much more distinct for
Cal.qua.. There is a hint of them but the image is not at all clear in that area, but I still think they should be better visible even from that perspective.
Also, for no. 6 I would have put my money's worth on
Coc.sep.. Paul is right that the shedded larval skin is not quite well enough in focus, but
to me it still looks a lot more like a
Coc.sep. skin than a
Har.axy. one. Also on this one the "impression" of size, jizz and colour all seem to fit better for
Coc.sep. than any of the other ones.
Which brings me to "the rest" ...
to me with all the basically brown hues (as opposed to "orange") they might as well be
Adalia as
Coc.cep. - or maybe even something else. As stated above though, colour/pattern is a bad indicator (very variable). This is where size would have been nice to know as
Adalia pupa (like the beetles) are distinctly smaller than
Coc.sep..
If anyone (Paul, Dogghound, ...?) has good morphological characters for these pupa I would love to know about about it - as stated I haven't done much serious looking at that yet.
Purely on jizz I would, at my current state of "knowledge", have 1 and 6 down for
Coc.sep. and the rest for
Adalia - but seeing that the leafs under 1,2 and 4 suggest they might be the same photo session ....
So, stricktly speaking I would have to remain at:
"If you want to know, you gotta breed'em out" (which is actually no effort at all and gives you amazing photo ops for very fresh beetles pumping up their wings etc!!)
In general there are some pupa that are quite distinctive (within the limited range of species known for the UK and/or NL), but for these particular ones I'm just not sure ... (yet?).
Sorry,
Arp