| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,146
Threads: 82,323
Posts: 853,103
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Mildred M | |  | 
08-07-2007, 04:42 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vauxhall, London
Posts: 703
| | | Dragon ID please Hiya, today at Chobham common I found several dragons,broad bodied chasers, a golden ringed, and these 2.
Is the first an Emperor? It seemed very green!
The second I have no idea about.
Thanks.
Za | 
08-07-2007, 05:11 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: teleford
Posts: 156
| | | Re: Dragon ID please im not sure but the top one looks like its layin eggs | 
08-07-2007, 05:17 PM
|  | Dame Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: North Kent
Posts: 9,725
| | | Re: Dragon ID please The top one is a female Emperor ovipositing, the second I think could be an over-mature Common Darter but get that checked out by Steve to make sure.
Jules
__________________ The female of the species is more deadly than the male.:p | 
08-07-2007, 05:37 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vauxhall, London
Posts: 703
| | | Re: Dragon ID please Cheers for that, I thought the first might have been an Emperor, but as it was almost fluorescent green I hoped for something special 
Za | 
08-07-2007, 06:45 PM
| | Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,609
| | | Re: Dragon ID please Yes first is an Emperor ovipositing; second is female Keeled Skimmer, a common species on the heathland bogs at Chobham- note the dorsal stripe! | 
08-07-2007, 08:59 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Rownhams, Hampshire
Posts: 203
| | | Re: Dragon ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by aeshna5 Yes first is an Emperor ovipositing; second is female Keeled Skimmer, a common species on the heathland bogs at Chobham- note the dorsal stripe! | Hi aeshna5
I'm struggling to see why it's not an overmature female Common Darter. The patterns on the top of segments 8/9/10 seem to be right and the black line along the side of the abdomen is broken whereas Keeled has a pretty even line down both the top and side of the abdomen. Also Keeled has fairly wide complete antehumeral stripes whereas this individual has just a couple of small incomplete stripes. The legs and eyes look spot on for Common too but I'm probably completely wrong!
Paul | 
09-07-2007, 10:26 AM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 281
| | | Re: Dragon ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by wint Hi aeshna5
I'm struggling to see why it's not an overmature female Common Darter. The patterns on the top of segments 8/9/10 seem to be right and the black line along the side of the abdomen is broken whereas Keeled has a pretty even line down both the top and side of the abdomen. Also Keeled has fairly wide complete antehumeral stripes whereas this individual has just a couple of small incomplete stripes. The legs and eyes look spot on for Common too but I'm probably completely wrong!
Paul | My first impression when I saw it was keeled, but you make some good points. Not too sure about the legs - I'm not seeing stripes on the rear two pairs, but this might be the angle of the photo. In favour of keeled there's the wing veination, particularly the band of cells above IR3 which appear to run direct to the lower edge, whereas in striolatum they double before the end. But it's not easy to see the ending in the photo. The pterostigma seems wider than I'd expect for striolatum as well. There does not appear to be any "side panels" to the thorax, which ought to be there in the darter, but everything else you mention is right, and I'd add that the thorax lacks the markings between the wings that I'd expect to see in coerulescens. Also there's the yellow 'Y' mark just in front of the wings - which is indicative of common darter. So all in all I'm inclined to say your right - it's a confusingly marked darter. | 
09-07-2007, 10:46 AM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Broad Hinton (thats near swindon)
Posts: 871
| | | Re: Dragon ID please i'm pretty certain its an over mature common darter, looking at the pterostigma, blackish brown rather than yellowy-brown and the yellow on the wing is restricted to the basal area, whereas on keeled its much more noticeable.
although my first thought was female keeled. had to get the book out to check!
__________________ I enjoy my life...its the only one I've got :D | 
09-07-2007, 08:16 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Rownhams, Hampshire
Posts: 203
| | | Re: Dragon ID please Quote:
Originally Posted by harasseddad My first impression when I saw it was keeled, but you make some good points. Not too sure about the legs - I'm not seeing stripes on the rear two pairs, but this might be the angle of the photo. In favour of keeled there's the wing veination, particularly the band of cells above IR3 which appear to run direct to the lower edge, whereas in striolatum they double before the end. But it's not easy to see the ending in the photo. The pterostigma seems wider than I'd expect for striolatum as well. There does not appear to be any "side panels" to the thorax, which ought to be there in the darter, but everything else you mention is right, and I'd add that the thorax lacks the markings between the wings that I'd expect to see in coerulescens. Also there's the yellow 'Y' mark just in front of the wings - which is indicative of common darter. So all in all I'm inclined to say your right - it's a confusingly marked darter. | I've tried counting the forewing Ax but either my eyesight has got worse (probable) or they're not discernible from the photo (possible). I asked a friend to have a look at the pic and hios response was "I don't normally have trouble with these two, but this a bit tricky!". Perhaps Za has other pics where the wings are in a parallel plane with the camera. A very interesting dragonfly - I've only seen female Keeled Skimmers hanging from foliage which gives a rather different perspective.
Paul |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 14 members and 316 guests | | BCBIRDER, briar rose, Deb London, fairplay, frits_b, GuyF, karen66, lulu1957, oxycera, PaulButterworth, rossy, Stark, Tormentil, Wharfrat | » New Wildlife Posts | | | Fly ID Today 10:52 AM 2 Replies, 33 Views | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 102 Views | | | | | |