| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,312
Posts: 853,038
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | | 
08-03-2010, 07:43 PM
| | Frozen | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Nr Canterbury, Kent
Posts: 1,100
| | | Lonesome George I'm sorry I can't find the bit of thread where I mentioned Lonesome George before. I have just looked him up on the net and I was right. He was taken to a place of safety on Santa Cruz in 1972, but his wives did not manage to wriggle through the red tape to get to him until 1993! Someone on the program I was watching said it could be too late. He might be infertile. Why didn't they put the females with him from the start?
Actually when I googled him they said they are imminently awaiting news on another batch of eggs. Lets all keep our fingers crossed for him!
I hope no one is keeping any other critically endengered animals in isolation | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 24 members and 237 guests | | Bladderwort, chrisjohnson, earthdragon64, Falcon5, faz, Gateside, Gill Catton, GTH, GuyF, Iona F, Lemars, lulu1957, nodd, rmc, rossy, scamps180, sebastianbawn, speyghillie, sunnydale, The Woodman, Tursiops2, watsthat, welsh.lensman, woosh | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |