| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
| 7 | |
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
| | 15 |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
| |
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
| |
29
|
30
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  » Stats |
Members: 32,214
Threads: 48,329
Posts: 523,854
Top Poster: glsammy (13,193)
| | Welcome to our newest member, northern_monkey | | |
Welcome to the Wild About Britain forums | | | | 
19-10-2009, 08:47 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Stalybridge
Posts: 146
| | | Handheld GPS
Getting more into walking since I recently retired , trying to get some fitness back after several years of doing nothing.
Been using a pedometer as a means of recording distance walked and calories burned but its not as accuarate as I would like.
As I intend to do a lot more and I am 5mins walk from the local moors I have been considering a handleld gps as an addition to my maps , and was wondering do they record distance covered when walking or is this only if you have put in a route and follow that route ?
Any recomends for under £200 ?
Seen a Navman W300 Sport at £40 which is gps based for distance/speed/calories but no map/routes at that price.
Julian |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Threaded Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
| | | 30 members and 166 guests | | acherontia, AshLee, Bruce Williams, cherrywaff, coopder, cybershot, Dave5xe, hobo1, James M, Jason Green, Jonners, JRsbugs, loripo, LynM, Michael Jordan, Mike Jackson, Monkster, Morchella, posie, Rich_, rogpow, Sprout, stigofthedump, sunnydale, thunder, Tracey.A, Ukwildlifeo, welsh.lensman, Wig, WOOF! | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | |   Old... Today 02:06 PM 13 Replies, 68 Views | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | | | | | | | |
