| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,312
Posts: 853,038
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | | 
04-02-2008, 04:24 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 15,069
| | | Re: Second camera body choice. Quote:
Originally Posted by Seajay Why, what did he say about the Bigma? I thought it was a great lens! I only sold it to help buy the 200-400. Anyway people say all sorts of things but they are only remarking on their own experience with the euipment they have its when hundreds of people are saying it you need worry. To my mind for the price it is a miracle of engineering and I will always remember it with fondness.
Colin | I quite agree with you. Although I'm going to change, the Bigma has proved to be a very versatile lens that's given me some excellent images. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 21 members and 220 guests | | Bladderwort, Dillybythesea, earthdragon64, faz, Gill Catton, GTH, GuyF, Iona F, Lemars, lulu1957, Malkie, nodd, rmc, rossy, scamps180, silver birder, speyghillie, sunnydale, Tursiops2, watsthat, woosh | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |