| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,312
Posts: 853,038
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | | 
13-10-2007, 06:52 PM
|  | Wild Member | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: North west.
Posts: 206
| | Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera Hi could I just ask what cameras you guys use. Your pictures are absolutely stunning. I have a little digital camera which takes good pictures but can be a bit blurry. What would be a good low cost camera to buy. Fi. X X X X
__________________ If it has a heartbeat no matter how small, it lives and has a purpose. | 
13-10-2007, 10:13 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Ijmuiden, Holland
Posts: 2,046
| | | Re: Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera Hello Fi, My daughter had just bought a Fuji FinePix S5700 and I am really impressed with it. It has a 10x optical zoom which doesn't produce grainy images and good macro images. She has used it mainly for archiatectural shots but I have tried it out for garden birds and plants and I never thought I would say it - but it beats my Canon Powershot A700 hands down. It also has an "in camera" cropping facility which is useful. It feels a bit more clumbersome than a normal compact and getting close-in on macro shots I have hit the subject a few times with it, not being able to judge the distance but that will change with a bit more practice. It also takes SD cards, not just the very small ones Fuji cameras use to use. We are really impressed with it so far. | 
13-10-2007, 10:48 PM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
| | Re: Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera Hi Fi,
I have the same Fuji pix and it is quite impressive. The only fault I can find is that its is really light and its hard to keep still when taking pictures, so I have a lot of pics that are blurred due to camera shake and headless birds. | 
14-10-2007, 06:50 AM
| | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 260
| | | Re: Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera I use a Canon Powershot a630, which cost about £150, I think the main problem with mine, is the person using it   , I've only recently taken up photography and it's my first step into getting used to all the different setting and terminology before taking out a second mortgage on one of the big boys
__________________ Of all the things I've lost, it's my mind I miss the most. | 
14-10-2007, 09:45 AM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 175
| | | Re: Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera I have a Fuji Finepix S5500 and it as taken literally 10's of thousands of pictures over the last couple of years. I use it on my walks 3 or 4 times a week taking on average 130 pictures a time. It is easy to use (it as to be for me to use). Probably pick one up for a song now.
Dave
__________________ Edith & Daves walks in the NW of England
http://www.wainwright-wanderings.co.uk/ | 
14-10-2007, 05:59 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: West Lancs
Posts: 846
| | | Re: Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera i have a kodak easyshare Z740 with 10 times zoom and even though i recently spent a lot of money on a digital SLR i still take the old kodak on every trip as it shoots movies and closeups and i can still get a decent picture with it for example
plus a bit of luck helps | 
16-10-2007, 11:15 AM
|  | Knight Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Scotland/Spain
Posts: 5,611
| | | Re: Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera I have the Sony Alpha 100, which I bought body only for £375. As I used to own Minolta film cameras all my old lenses fitted the Sony.
If you are serious about photography then I would advice you to get a DSLR camera as you can then add to the system with different lenses, flash etc. | 
25-10-2007, 02:27 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,369
| | | Re: Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera I bought a Fuji Finepix S5700 about 2 months and found it a great camera especially for macro shots. It was a very good price @ £123. Then I had to add a SD card which cost another tenner.
When you get used to it you can get some very decent shots. The digital zoom is a bonus but the images are not that good unless you use a tripod.
I'm now looking at a proper DSLR, probably a Canon. 
Paul
__________________ Don't blow it - good planets are hard to find. | 
25-10-2007, 04:23 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Nottingham
Posts: 15,069
| | | Re: Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera If your anything like me, you'll start with a decent compact, mine was the Canon S2 IS, then realize you need more zoom range, so I went for a Panasonic FZ30, almost immediately realised I still needed even more range, plus better low light capability so took a deep breath and plunged for a DSLR. | 
31-10-2007, 10:02 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Nairn,Nairnshire,Scotland
Posts: 3,355
| | | Re: Good Low Cost Wildlife Camera I use a Nikon D40 with 18-55 & 55-200mm lens hope to add to it as find the 200mm lens nit quite good enough for bird photography but because the D40 only uses Dx lens by Nikon when I upgrade to larger lens will lose Af and have to work in manual focus only.Small payment for a terrific little Dslr |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 18 members and 208 guests | | britnik, Dillybythesea, earthdragon64, Gill Catton, GTH, GuyF, Lemars, lulu1957, Malkie, MattPrince, nodd, nutmeg, rmc, silver birder, speyghillie, sunnydale, Tursiops2, woosh | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |