| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,312
Posts: 853,037
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | | 
18-02-2012, 11:53 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: Unidentified fungi - Braemar woodland - Aberdeenshire Hello, Quote:
Originally Posted by waxcap Bravo! Mal.
Not wanting to stir thing up any more - and my question arises from true ignorance but:- Shouldn't Russula only be italicised when used in a name i.e. Russula emetica and not when used as a noun in a sentence?
And another thing - when you quote another post it's all italicised anyway.  | italizing names is nothing that is subject to a law or the botanical code or whatever. You can do that or not, no one will care. The only thing where it matters is in publications. There you will have to follow the "guidelines for authors", which may be different from journal to journal. There it is indicated, what shall be italized, what shall be bold etc.etc. Usually names from genus downwards are italized, names from families upwards are not. But there are also journals where you shall italize also the families and subfamilies, sections etc. Some want all authors names to be in capitals, some only in literature citatons, some don't do that at all.
But that a name shall be italized in a binominal, but not when used as genus name alone, I have never heared of. Especially as you can imagine yourself a "sp." or "spec." behind "Russula" - and then you have a binominal again ...
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de
Last edited by mollisia; 18-02-2012 at 11:56 AM.
| 
18-02-2012, 06:42 PM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
| | | Re: Unidentified fungi - Braemar woodland - Aberdeenshire Quote:
Originally Posted by waxcap sp. is short for species. If you know the genus but not the species you put sp. after the genus. Russula is the genus. There are something like 750 species of Russula worldwide and something like 160 in Europe....
... Russulas can be quite hard to identify just by sight.
Dave | Thanks Dave for all that info - all quite clear the first time, though some of the further information was interesting too!
Best wishes,
John | 
18-02-2012, 06:51 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Saddleworth
Posts: 4,134
| | | Re: Unidentified fungi - Braemar woodland - Aberdeenshire Hells bells, semantics and semiotics on WAB, what next?
Why italicise though?
Simplicity rules - providing its accurate english and biologically right should reign in my view, but taking Andreas' points into account I guess.
Cheers
Ken
__________________ Sensible Mole, said Ratty, perceiving Old Burton Beer.....
Last edited by diggleken; 18-02-2012 at 06:53 PM.
| 
18-02-2012, 07:06 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Unidentified fungi - Braemar woodland - Aberdeenshire Quote:
Originally Posted by diggleken Hells bells, semantics and semiotics on WAB, what next?
Why italicise though?
Simplicity rules - providing its accurate english and biologically right should reign in my view, but taking Andreas' points into account I guess.
Cheers
Ken |
But fungi, as with most other natural organisms, knows no boundary's - they are international.
The British cannot have it all their own way, and our scientists (that's not me !) have accepted the Linnaeus System which most of the civilised world also (and have to) use.
Neil. | 
18-02-2012, 07:14 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Saddleworth
Posts: 4,134
| | | Re: Unidentified fungi - Braemar woodland - Aberdeenshire Quote:
Originally Posted by fairplay But fungi, as with most other natural organisms, knows no boundary's - they are international.
The British cannot have it all their own way, and our scientists (that's not me !) have accepted the Linnaeus System which most of the civilised world also (and have to) use.
Neil. | Agreed Neil, perhaps (probably) I wasnt clear - I was trying to drive at simplicity within those rules - without, as Andreas says, italics etc depending on the publishers whims etc etc - and of course this Linnaean nomenclature stuff applies to all.......
Cheers
Ken
__________________ Sensible Mole, said Ratty, perceiving Old Burton Beer..... | 
18-02-2012, 07:19 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: The New Forest
Posts: 460
| | | Re: Unidentified fungi - Braemar woodland - Aberdeenshire   Thanks for that Andreas. That makes sense. | 
18-02-2012, 09:05 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Unidentified fungi - Braemar woodland - Aberdeenshire Quote:
Originally Posted by diggleken Agreed Neil, perhaps (probably) I wasnt clear - I was trying to drive at simplicity within those rules - without, as Andreas says, italics etc depending on the publishers whims etc etc - and of course this Linnaean nomenclature stuff applies to all.......
Cheers
Ken | Considering the amount of new members joining the WAB Fungi Forum it makes sense to relax the Linnaeus rules a little and it will do no harm to use errr um ... (is this called Roman ?) instead of Italics now and again.
Neil. | 
18-02-2012, 09:47 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: The New Forest
Posts: 460
| | | Re: Unidentified fungi - Braemar woodland - Aberdeenshire Quote:
Originally Posted by fairplay Considering the amount of new members joining the WAB Fungi Forum it makes sense to relax the Linnaeus rules a little and it will do no harm to use errr um ... (is this called Roman ?) instead of Italics now and again.
Neil. | Yes we don't need the Old Grammar and Italicisation Technocrat s jumping on us at every oppurtunity. | 
22-02-2012, 06:55 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: South Bedfordshire
Posts: 552
| | | Re: Unidentified fungi - Braemar woodland - Aberdeenshire Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Yeates it's a Russula . . . . I don't care what you do with it
Chris | Ha Ha Ha Ha    
You really don't like them do you?
Regards Alison |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 21 members and 180 guests | | Boomer1967, britnik, Deb London, Dillybythesea, FUDGEY, GTH, GuyF, jo0ls, johnwray205, Jonsfotos, Lemars, loripo, Malkie, MattPrince, mollisia, nutmeg, rogpow, roseway, speyghillie, tjhavenith, Uv moth notingha | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |