| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,312
Posts: 853,037
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | | 
13-02-2012, 07:24 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 123
| | | Lepiota species possibly From my back catalogue of "not yet identified".
I have tentatively gone for Lepiota aspera (acutesquamosa) but having viewed a number of images both on WAB and elsewhere I am far from convinced.
Anyone care to point me in the right direction .....
Thanks for your indulgence of a mere beginner !! | 
13-02-2012, 08:42 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Lepiota species possibly Did you take a look underneath ?
If you did you would have almost certainly had seen TUBES.
I think this is a Bolete species, but without seeing the stem features I don't think anyone would dare hazard a guess as to which - shame as it's a great photo. L.aspera has a cap covered in raised warts/squamules/scales that are proud of the cap surface.
Neil | 
13-02-2012, 09:01 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 123
| | | Re: Lepiota species possibly Quote:
Originally Posted by fairplay Did you take a look underneath ?
If you did you would have almost certainly had seen TUBES.
I think this is a Bolete species, but without seeing the stem features I don't think anyone would dare hazard a guess as to which - shame as it's a great photo. L.aspera has a cap covered in raised warts/squamules/scales that are proud of the cap surface.
Neil | Those raised scales are precisely why I was worried about my ID, hadn't considered a bolete but have no other photos showing the stem / pores if there were any to be seen ....
Thanks for your input, looks like another one to look out for again later this year, I now know you need far more detail to ascertain an ID | 
13-02-2012, 10:31 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Lepiota species possibly I'm playing too safe really, and think I can risk saying this is probably Boletus porosporus - there are others with a cracked surface but only one with this colour. (Unless Mal says different  )
Neil. | 
13-02-2012, 10:44 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 123
| | | Re: Lepiota species possibly Just been having another look at the original photo and on close inspection I am sure I can see "teeth" around the edge of the cap ?? so maybe not a bolete | 
14-02-2012, 06:13 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Lepiota species possibly Yes, I spotting this too so blew the photo up to full size. But I believe this is how tubes would have looked when slightly distorted at the extreme edge.
They also seem to be yellow which also fits. The worry is that there are also gilled fungi with this type of cracked surface too, but I'm staying with a Boletus species.
Neil. | 
14-02-2012, 06:46 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: Lepiota species possibly Hello,
I fully agree to Neils opinion, that this is a bolet. And also that it belongs in the group of Boletus chrysenteron, which is today by many (even some british  ) accepted as a genus of its own: Xercomellus.
The only thing I would through in against X. porosporus is the small wound on the cap of the right fruitbody, which is discoloured reddish. That would be more typical for X. chrysenteron ss. str. then for X. porosporus.
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de | 
14-02-2012, 06:58 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 123
| | | Re: Lepiota species possibly Thanks Neil and Andreas
Have now viewed many images of X. porosporus including several on WAB and concede you are both correct, silly of me to doubt your earlier reply Neil !!
even found the above image on WAB that Andreas identified as X. porosporus several years ago, so Sepia Bolete it is ......
Thanks again for the help, I must learn to look beyond the obvious .... and even check for pores over gills !!! | 
14-02-2012, 08:25 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Lepiota species possibly Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood Wanderer Thanks Neil and Andreas
Have now viewed many images of X. porosporus including several on WAB and concede you are both correct, silly of me to doubt your earlier reply Neil !!
even found the above image on WAB that Andreas identified as X. porosporus several years ago, so Sepia Bolete it is ......
Thanks again for the help, I must learn to look beyond the obvious .... and even check for pores over gills !!! | I read it differently. I believe what Andreas is saying is that the fungus comes under the general group of Xerocomas chrycenteron which includes porosporus, rubellus, ripariellus, pruinatus, engelii, cisalpinus, bubelinus and armeniacus. (plus a few more that have not been found in Britain yet)
These have all now been placed within the new genus of Xerocomellus
Because of a teensy weensy  patch on the cap showing some redness, Andreas feels this should be Xerocomellus chrycenteron and not X.porosporus and with somebody trying to break my arm behind my back, I reluctantly have to agree with Andreas.
So Sepia Bolete it is NOT, but boring old Red Cracked Bolete it IS. (Couldn't you find a bit of Polyfiller to cover that red patch with - then it would easily pass for X.porosporus  )
Confused ?
Neil.
Last edited by fairplay; 14-02-2012 at 08:27 PM.
| 
14-02-2012, 08:51 PM
| | Wild Member | | Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 123
| | | Re: Lepiota species possibly Thanks for the added confusion ..... and I thought it was all settled, oh the joys of fungi ID !!!
Interestingly Red Cracking Bolete is quite common in this area and I have never seen it with this light cap colour it is always darker and cracked / torn to fully reveal the red colour beneath.
Still I have learnt a few more Genus along the way
John |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 21 members and 182 guests | | Boomer1967, britnik, Deb London, Dillybythesea, FUDGEY, GTH, GuyF, jo0ls, johnwray205, Jonsfotos, Lemars, loripo, Malkie, MattPrince, mollisia, nutmeg, rogpow, roseway, speyghillie, tjhavenith, Uv moth notingha | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |