| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,311
Posts: 853,029
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | | 
15-01-2012, 09:10 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: South Bedfordshire
Posts: 552
| | Re: Fungus ID please, possibly a Waxcap? Neil
Hope your chicken thigh hunger is satiated, but confused I am !!!!!!
Was slimy, no garlic smellling or cream visible.
My specimen could have been Buttercap, no Cointreau apparent.
To make sure it wasn't M.cucumis, am having a glass of wine.
Will chocolate make it better?
Looking at the butter in the fridge and caps in the hall cupboard, I am none the wiser ...... | 
15-01-2012, 10:28 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Fungus ID please, possibly a Waxcap? Can't talk just now, me mouth's full - I'm scoffing down my Tesco's finest Xmas pudding and finishing off the cream with another added shot of Cointreau (I had a large bottle given me for Xmas and I hate the stuff on its own)
Neil. | 
16-01-2012, 06:07 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Fungus ID please, possibly a Waxcap? Quote:
Originally Posted by stickman Hi all
Looks a lot like Macrocystidia cucumis to me... | that was my first thought but a slimy cap doesn't quite match up to a pileal surface covered in cystidia . . . . .
Chris
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling" | 
17-01-2012, 07:04 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: Fungus ID please, possibly a Waxcap? Hello,
I also would bet my microscope that this is Macrocystidia cucumis. When it rains, you don't see the pruinose layer of the cap, and why shouldn't it then have a, say, slippery cap. I doesn't look really slimy either, at least not what I recognize as "slimy" when handling wet Phlegmacium species
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de | 
17-01-2012, 07:13 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Fungus ID please, possibly a Waxcap? Quote:
Originally Posted by mollisia Hello,
I also would bet my microscope that this is Macrocystidia cucumis. When it rains, you don't see the pruinose layer of the cap, and why shouldn't it then have a, say, slippery cap. I doesn't look really slimy either, at least not what I recognize as "slimy" when handling wet Phlegmacium species
best regards,
Andreas |   You can afford to loose your microscope because you have the Zeiss Jena factory next door, you lucky so and so.
Neil. | 
17-01-2012, 08:35 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: South Bedfordshire
Posts: 552
| | | Re: Fungus ID please, possibly a Waxcap? Thanks Andreas
Perhaps slippery was a more accurate description of the cap, but I didn't get the smell. Must clear the tubes next time before sniffing
However as a microscope is at stake here, I wouldn't now doubt that it is Macrocystidia cucumis for a minute.
Thanks also to Chris & Neil | 
17-01-2012, 09:09 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: Fungus ID please, possibly a Waxcap? Hello Neil, Quote:
Originally Posted by fairplay   You can afford to loose your microscope because you have the Zeiss Jena factory next door, you lucky so and so.
Neil. | lucky??? 
To pass by every day a factory with microscopes that are very good - but I can't afford .... Yes, that's really great luck
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de | 
17-01-2012, 09:15 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jena - Germany
Posts: 1,458
| | | Re: Fungus ID please, possibly a Waxcap? Hello, Quote:
Originally Posted by alindsay but I didn't get the smell. Must clear the tubes next time before sniffing  | or put away the cigar before sniffing 
If the fruitbody isn't damaged at all, it doesn't smell. But if you bruise the gills, you should have the smell without problems usually. Quote:
Originally Posted by alindsay However as a microscope is at stake here, I wouldn't now doubt that it is Macrocystidia cucumis for a minute. | hehe, good bluff, isn't it
best regards,
Andreas
__________________ http://www.mollisia.de |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 0 members and 182 guests | | No Members online | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |