Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnek It was the other comment that was upsetting, and unnecessary. . . . . |
hello Lynne
I apologise totally for having upset you - I certainly don't have any wish to upset anyone's Sunday (if you leave out George Osborne, David Cameron and Rupert Murdoch and a few others . . . . . ); on a forum like this it is difficult to get some points across, which over a drink in a pub, looking at some photographs, would be much less confrontational . . .
however I do not agree that I was being unnecessary; the fact remains that a lot of your posts
are of the "here's a picture what is it?" type frankly, which do imply others doing the work, don't they?
this selfsame image has appeared on an earlier thread:
Another unidentified New Forest fungi
where I spent some time expanding on Nick C's correction of "fungi" to explain that to you; the fact that no-one was prepared to hazard even a guess at the identity of the fungus should have been a clue that there is really not enough evidence there to do so - nothing's changed
I have also been positive on other threads of yours - eg:
ID please
and on ones where there wasn't even an acknowledgement that you had seen the reponse:
ID please
there to one of mine - here to a couple of Andreas's :
Unidentified fungi seen in Southern Spain in January
and:
ID please
where he points out the necessity of providing more information and as good as possible images; it appears that you are reluctant to pick fruitbodies, take them home, and do a little work with them (I might be incorrect here?); that can help considerably in naming things for you
and finally:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnek . . . . . .
Maybe I don't put all the info you "experts" need but I am interested in any real answers . . . . . . |
you are kind of agreeing with my original point - you are not giving the information needed - which is a pity because it should be possible to do that; I also have
never in print, online, or in life called myself an "expert" - indeed I refute the word as regards myself - there's perhaps a whiff of sarcasm in your use of the term
so apologies freely given where deserved

- forums such as this do tend to make shades of grey difficult to communicate at times
best wishes (honestly)
Chris