| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,311
Posts: 853,029
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | | 
03-12-2011, 08:21 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 56
| | | A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please Hi there, a few fungi I've come across that I either have some idea or no idea at all as to their identity!
First one, I suspect is Mycena galericulata
This one, Mycena galopus? Caps about 2cm across.
These tiny brackets I have no idea, but they look lovely.
This one, again I have no idea.
Apologies for the rather decayed state of this final one, growing on a fallen willow root
Thanks for looking
Julian | 
03-12-2011, 08:53 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 691
| | | Re: A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please I will bow down to superior mycological intellect but how about;
1 Rhodocollybia butryacea
2 Mycena sp
3 -
4 Lepista nuda
5 Gymnopilus junonius
Cheers
Pete | 
03-12-2011, 09:00 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please top one isn't Rhodocollybia - those gills are nowehere near crowded enough for starters; galericulata is a possibility
third one is probably a Crepidotus; I would suspect C. cesatii but you need to do the microscopy
Chris
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling" | 
03-12-2011, 09:09 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 691
| | | Re: A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please I agree about the first one Chris, bit of a stab in the dark really. I was a bit rash there, with hindsight they are much to small for buttercap and the caps don`t fit. I was just taken by the shape and colour of the stem.
Pete | 
04-12-2011, 08:02 AM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 56
| | | Re: A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please Many thanks for those responses. I'll have to keep an eye out for more of those Crepidotus, I'll have to upgrade my starter microscope for spores!
thanks
Julian | 
04-12-2011, 08:12 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please Quote:
Originally Posted by tawnyman Many thanks for those responses. I'll have to keep an eye out for more of those Crepidotus, I'll have to upgrade my starter microscope for spores!
thanks
Julian | You will need a very expensive upgrade, as separating some of those Crepidotus sp. spores from each other can be quite difficult.
Neil. | 
04-12-2011, 09:49 AM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 56
| | | Re: A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please Yes, I'll need a whole new microscope as mine only goes up to a paltry 20x. I gather you need about 1500x for some of the spores?
julian | 
04-12-2011, 10:15 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please Quote:
Originally Posted by tawnyman Yes, I'll need a whole new microscope as mine only goes up to a paltry 20x. I gather you need about 1500x for some of the spores?
julian | Don't even think of going there - 1,000 x is adequate for your needs.
Neil. | 
04-12-2011, 12:09 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please Quote:
Originally Posted by tawnyman Yes, I'll need a whole new microscope as mine only goes up to a paltry 20x. I gather you need about 1500x for some of the spores?
julian | Neil is quite correct; also for Crepidotus the shape of the cystidia is as important as spore ornamentation - see: Fungus of the day!
don't buy into the idea that the higher the magnification the better (you wouldn't go out birdwatching in woodland with 20 x 50 binoculars, or if you did you wouldn't see much); the key is to use the lowest possible magnification in order to resolve the features you're looking at
Chris
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling" | 
04-12-2011, 03:31 PM
| | Active Member | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 56
| | | Re: A few fungi to be confirmed/identified please No, quite right, it's the same in astronomy, above a certain magnification you don't see more, quite the reverse, but that's more about contrast. So a thousand times should be enough then. I just took a few photos through my microscope of the gills of a mushroom I brought in from the garden. I did some better shots illuminated from below but this one caught my eye.
I was surprised to see the groups of four dots. Does anyone know what these are exactly?
julian |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 1 members and 186 guests | | John_M | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |