| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,311
Posts: 853,029
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | | 
29-11-2011, 06:10 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? Quote:
Originally Posted by RobSutton That's interesting - there must be quite a lot of geographical variation in it's host. Up here it's almost exclusively on Ash, and I've always thought of it as being an Ash specialist and very rarely find it on anything else - but then again we don't get much Elm. Are Ash and Elm closely related? | I'm not sure how close Ash is to Elm, but in Suffolk and in my opinion, Gorse is favoured next to dead Elm as a host to Velvet Shank.
It would be interesting to know how it fares over the rest of Britain (preferred host wise)
Neil. | 
29-11-2011, 06:38 PM
|  | Officer of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Derby
Posts: 964
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? There is a huge variation in form in F. velutipes, Here are three of my photos, but unfortunately I did not record the type of wood they were on:
Peter
__________________ The key to understanding fungi is careful observation of macroscopic and microscopic features | 
29-11-2011, 06:43 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 2,589
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? I've done a quick sort of the FRDB to host for Velvet Shank and found:
Elm 202 records
Birch 58
Oak 52
Beech 51
Ash 35
Gorse 31
Lime 11
Hawthorn 11
Sycamore (Acer in general) 8
Obviously my perception of Velvet Shank as an Ash specialist is tainted by living and having lived in northern/limestone areas of the country where Ash is perhaps the commonest tree species.
__________________ Rob
More photographs at my Website | 
29-11-2011, 07:13 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? Quote:
Originally Posted by RobSutton . . . . Are Ash and Elm closely related? | I don't know, Rob  . . . . no, they're not - they're not even in the same order: - the ash is actually in the olive family (and therefore extremely isolated as a native British tree) and in the order Lamiales
- the elms are in the order Rosales
it's hard to get ones head around the fact that ash is more closely related to mint, and elms more closely related to strawberries and nettles, than they are to one another
unless Flammulina turns out to be a species-complex of more host-related taxa I don't think host has much to do with it - perhaps it was more a case of DED creating large numbers of suitable dead trees
cheers
Chris
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling" | 
29-11-2011, 07:21 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? And my perception of Gorse being 2nd most favoured in Suffolk is due to my living on (former) heathland.
Neil. | 
01-12-2011, 09:33 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: York
Posts: 3,314
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? Just to add my two penneth
This group on an old carved stump 
fooled me for a while but this one had the more characteristic stipe 
The "big" problem was that the largest fully mature cap was less 1cm across  I eventually found that there was a L velutipes forma pigmaea of this size that used to be recognized.
Mal | 
01-12-2011, 07:30 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: herts
Posts: 332
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? Quote:
Originally Posted by RobSutton I've done a quick sort of the FRDB to host for Velvet Shank and found:
Elm 202 records
Birch 58
Oak 52
Beech 51
Ash 35
Gorse 31
Lime 11
Hawthorn 11
Sycamore (Acer in general) 8
Obviously my perception of Velvet Shank as an Ash specialist is tainted by living and having lived in northern/limestone areas of the country where Ash is perhaps the commonest tree species. |
the irony of that statement is that it is incredibly common on horse chestnut, on which it is one of the most common saprobics, elm is also a favourite.
tony, a tree surgeon!
__________________ www.arb-mycota.com | 
01-12-2011, 09:47 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? Quote:
Originally Posted by hamadryad the irony of that statement is that it is incredibly common on horse chestnut, on which it is one of the most common saprobics, elm is also a favourite.
tony, a tree surgeon! | So why doesn't Aesculus hippocastanum come high on the FRDBI list then Tony ? Naughty boy, you haven't been sending your records in.
(Mind, nor have I, but I will, I will !)
Neil. | 
02-12-2011, 04:32 AM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 2,589
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? Quote:
Originally Posted by hamadryad the irony of that statement is that it is incredibly common on horse chestnut, on which it is one of the most common saprobics, elm is also a favourite.
tony, a tree surgeon! | Not quite sure why it was ironic but never mind. Using the FRDBI Associated Organism search facility gave just 14 records for Horse Chestnut - it wasn't in my original list as I hadn't bothered checking for it. I've put the link in above if you want to have a look at any other species of tree.
As Neil implies any data base is only as good as the records submitted so this is obviously not the complete picture.
__________________ Rob
More photographs at my Website | 
02-12-2011, 05:08 PM
|  | Member of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: herts
Posts: 332
| | | Re: Is this sulphur tuft or honey? Quote:
Originally Posted by RobSutton Not quite sure why it was ironic but never mind. Using the FRDBI Associated Organism search facility gave just 14 records for Horse Chestnut - it wasn't in my original list as I hadn't bothered checking for it. I've put the link in above if you want to have a look at any other species of tree.
As Neil implies any data base is only as good as the records submitted so this is obviously not the complete picture. | yes irony wrong word.
theres a fistulina record said to be "on leaves" too anyone else found fistulina hepatica on leaves, or in fact any other species than quercus robur/petrea and castanea sativa?
__________________ www.arb-mycota.com |  | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 0 members and 168 guests | | No Members online | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |