| | S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
| |
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
| |
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
| |
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
| |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 | 2 | » Stats |
Members: 50,142
Threads: 82,311
Posts: 853,029
Top Poster: glsammy (15,069) | | Welcome to our newest member, Posbyonechop | |  | 
23-08-2011, 02:13 AM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 23
| | | Gymnopilus ID needed
Last edited by FungiJohn; 23-08-2011 at 02:50 PM.
Reason: spaced images
| 
23-08-2011, 10:51 AM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Gymnopilus ID needed I do not have too much experience with these Gymnopilus spp. but a possibility could be G.sapineus.
I am sure you do have Gymnopilus here, but the colours lack the reddish brown I would normally expect, perhaps it was just a dull day.
Neil. | 
23-08-2011, 08:05 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Gymnopilus ID needed Why are we working on this definitely being a Gymnopilus? The colours especially the colours of that spore print don't look quite right to me - might be an artefact of course
as MH suggests a microscope would certainly help; it's also a pity that the shots do not show some possible useful characters in focus
then again it was in Derbyshire
Chris
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling" | 
23-08-2011, 08:32 PM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 23
| | | Re: Gymnopilus ID needed Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Yeates Why are we working on this definitely being a Gymnopilus? The colours especially the colours of that spore print don't look quite right to me - might be an artefact of course
as MH suggests a microscope would certainly help; it's also a pity that the shots do not show some possible useful characters in focus
then again it was in Derbyshire
Chris | Someone on another forum suggested that it was a Gymnopilus which is what I thought it might be when I first saw it, he said that without a microscope it would be difficult to ID it but I thought that I'd come here and see if any of the helpful people on here may have any ideas.
Thanks for the suggestion fairplay, G.sapineus seems like a reasonable suggestion based on what we have to work on. | 
23-08-2011, 08:52 PM
| | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,261
| | | Re: Gymnopilus ID needed Best to pay heed to what Chris has to say and the colour, especially of the spore print does look quite dodgy.
Can't think what else it could be though.
Neil. | 
23-08-2011, 10:49 PM
|  | Commander of the Wild Empire | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,648
| | | Re: Gymnopilus ID needed Quote:
Originally Posted by MushroomHunter . . . . G.sapineus seems like a reasonable suggestion based on what we have to work on. | trouble is that G. sapineus is (even using micro-characters) often difficult to distinguish from G. penetrans . . . . . and then there's G. hybridus - these three have been differently interpreted in the past as well . . .
have you still got the spore print MH?
Chris
__________________ "You must know it's right - The spore is on the wind tonight"
--Steely Dan, "Rose Darling" | 
24-08-2011, 08:27 AM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 23
| | | Re: Gymnopilus ID needed Yes I still have the spore print. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | 0 members and 187 guests | | No Members online | » New Wildlife Posts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » New Environment Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Activity Posts | | | | | | | | | » New Community Posts | | | Spammers! Yesterday 08:00 AM 5 Replies, 99 Views | | | | | |